What the Data for This Category Looks Like
This category of data includes four main types of daily documents: permission matrices, organizational structure tables, role configuration records, and permission change tickets. Data sources are customer HR systems, identity directories, product backends, and audit logs. Updates occur per ticket or irregularly, triggered by customer permission adjustments or organizational structure changes. Data fields include department hierarchy, role permission mapping rules, account ownership relationships, and change approval status, among others. There are no unified fixed units, with adjustments made based on the customer’s business scenario. This data supports three user groups: implementation consultants, customer administrators, and technical support, to enable permission verification and isolation configuration during operations duty and internal ticket handling.
Constraints Imposed on Permission and Data Isolation
Decentralized data sources require permission configuration to connect to multiple systems, which can lead to inconsistent permission mappings across systems. Irregular updates mean permission isolation rules must support dynamic adjustments, and cannot rely on static, fixed configuration logic. Diverse document types require the permission configuration interface to support validation rules for different fields, adapting to all types of permission adjustment scenarios. Different user roles mean the operation permission scope for each account must be differentiated, to prevent unauthorized access to non-authorized data by operations duty staff. Incorrect permission configuration can cause issues including unauthorized access, stalled business processes, and failed audits. As a result, the permission isolation link must meet requirements for traceability, validation, and compliance.
This document applies to FastGPT v4.17.0. All configuration items below are based on the official parameters and interface logic of this version.
How to Configure the Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
teamId Tenant Binding | Bind the full business data scope of the corresponding customer | Ensure permission isolation uses the customer tenant as the basic unit, matching the tenant identification logic of data sources |
tmbId Role Mapping | Bind permission rules corresponding to departments and positions | Associate the position and department fields of the organizational structure table to achieve fine-grained permission allocation |
| Organizational Hierarchy Validation Switch | Enable cross-hierarchy permission validation | Match the hierarchical constraints of the permission matrix, preventing unauthorized access to data from non-direct subordinate departments |
| Permission Change Log Retention | Retain change records for at least 180 days | Meet the data retention requirements of audit logs, adapting to the audit verification needs of daily documents |
| Multi-Account Team Ownership Validation | Validate account permissions using the teamId + tmbId combination | Match account ownership relationships from the identity directory, ensuring accounts in the same team share the legal permission scope |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Custom plugin input and output parameters do not display after adding the plugin to a workflow. The cause is that the permission scope of the customer associated with the plugin was not bound via
teamId, and permission validation blocked the parameter loading logic of the configuration page. - Multiple accounts cannot be created in the same team after local deployment. The cause is that the
tmbIdrole mapping rules were not configured correctly, causing account ownership validation to fail and preventing association with the corresponding team node. - Permission isolation fails after SSO integration. The cause is that account fields in the identity directory were not bound to
teamIdandtmbId, resulting in inability to identify the customer and department that the account belongs to.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Successful
- Log in to test accounts under different
teamIdvalues, verify that only permission configuration data for the corresponding tenant can be viewed, to confirm tenant isolation is active. - After adjusting role permission rules, check whether corresponding change records are generated in the audit log, to confirm the trace configuration is active.
- Attempt to access non-authorized data using a cross-department account, verify whether permission interception is triggered, to confirm the hierarchical validation configuration is active.
- Configure multiple accounts with the same team ownership, verify that accounts can normally access team ticket and configuration data, to confirm the role mapping is active.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.