What the Data for This Category Looks Like
The data for this category centers on the generation and verification of bid-related documents. Sources include tender announcements, bidding documents, enterprise qualification databases, and supplier quotations. Daily processed documents include bid documents, qualification certificates, commercial deviation tables, and technical deviation tables. Document structures strictly follow fixed formats from tenderers, containing fields such as chapter numbers, response content, qualification numbers, and quotation details. Each tender project corresponds to an independent dataset, with an update frequency of once per project. Data must match the specific requirements of the current tender.
How This Category’s Characteristics Create Constraints for "Sharing and Embedding"
The project-specific data nature of this category requires embedded Q&A applications to be associated with the FastGPT knowledge base ID of the corresponding tender project, to avoid cross-project data confusion. The fixed document structure requires the embedded interface to implement precise matching of tender terminology via external systems, to reduce deviations from generic Q&A. The high-frequency project-specific update requirement requires relying on an external knowledge base management system to quickly switch knowledge bases, without repeated configuration. The sensitive data error consequence characteristic requires the embedded interface to configure access restrictions via external systems, while retaining complete operation logs via FastGPT’s built-in capabilities for traceability. The long-text bid document characteristic requires embedded context recall to cover sufficient relevant content, to avoid missing key clauses.
This document is written based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing Entry shareId | Copy the complete share link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; bid document preparation business records and data permissions must still be handled by external systems |
| Share Link Validity Period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing per bid document preparation collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user; requires verification combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity Verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a share link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced Content Display | Select display configurations for referenced fragments, full text, or original text based on the sensitivity of bid document preparation materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission control |
| Conversation Record Verification | Test example: Prepare 10 bid document preparation Q&A samples, and check them in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearing |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Sharing entry for bid document preparation fails to open. First verify the complete system-generated link and its validity period, then check browser request statuses; do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of bid document preparation data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same bid document preparation Q&A is not visible on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser, and local identity status; record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearing, and service abnormalities cannot be judged solely based on this phenomenon.
How to Confirm Correct Configuration
- Open the embedded page, enter keywords corresponding to the tender project, and check if the returned content includes relevant response items for commercial deviation tables and technical deviation tables.
- Attempt to initiate a simulated work order question in the embedded interface, confirm that there are no timeout errors during the conversation process, and that the response content complies with the format requirements of the current tender project.
- View the access logs of the embedded page, confirm that only internal network IP addresses can initiate conversation requests, and there are no abnormal external access records.
- Test the validity of the share link, confirm that the link can be accessed normally within the test set period, and that the embedded interface cannot be opened after expiration.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.