What data in this category looks like
Data for this category primarily comes from data asset inventories, database metadata, business system descriptions, and compliance regulatory documents. Core daily maintenance documents include data catalogs, classification and grading rules, important data identification tables, and review minutes. Data fields include asset name, sensitivity level, affiliated system, associated compliance items, and others. There is no unified fixed unit. Update frequency follows a quarterly cycle or is triggered after a single business system change.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the "Sharing and Embedding" workflow
This category has scattered data sources and irregular update rhythms. The embedded knowledge base must match the synchronization mechanism of external business systems. Data synchronization is triggered by external business systems, then updated to the FastGPT knowledge base. This avoids returning outdated classification and grading rules. Document types include structured tables, plain text rules, and review minutes. General document chunking logic easily causes confusion across document fragments. Targeted knowledge base chunking rules must be configured. The data includes compliance-related items. Strict authentication via third-party identity verification supported by the commercial edition must be configured during the sharing and embedding process. This prevents unauthorized access to sensitive data. The operations duty and ticket scenario requires real-time response. The context length of the embedded window and call timeout threshold must be adapted to the time requirements of the business process.
How to configure settings
This document is written based on FastGPT v4.17.0. The following configuration items are adapted to the interface and parameter logic of this version.
| Configuration Item | Suggested Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing Entry shareId | Copy the complete share link generated by the system, do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; data security classification and grading business records and data permissions still need to be processed by external systems |
| Share Link Validity Period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of data security classification and grading collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user; needs to be verified combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity Verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify the commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a share link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced Content Display | Select the display configuration of referenced fragments, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity level of data security classification and grading materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission control |
| Conversation Record Verification | Test example: Prepare 10 data security classification and grading Q&A samples, check on the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after clearing cache |
Three common errors
- Failure to open the sharing entry related to data security classification and grading. First verify the complete system-generated link and its validity period, then check the browser request status. Do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of data security classification and grading data does not match expectations. Verify the third-party identity verification result, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately. The sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same data security classification and grading Q&A cannot be viewed on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first check the device, browser, and local identity status. Retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after clearing cache; do not use this phenomenon alone to judge service abnormalities.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Access the domain name of the bound internal operations or ticket system, verify that the embedded conversation window can normally load document content such as classification and grading rules and data catalogs.
- Attempt to access the share link from an unauthorized domain name, confirm that data cannot be obtained or an authentication prompt pops up.
- Submit a test ticket, trigger the embedded compliance verification process, confirm that the conversation window can return grading results matching the current assets.
- Check the external business system knowledge base synchronization logs, confirm that data updates are completed according to the preset cycle with no failed records.
- Test the access permission of the share link, confirm that unbound domain names cannot call the embedding function.
All provided configuration values are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.