What the data for this category looks like
Data for this category comes from enterprise databases, data dictionaries, in-house masking tools, and access approval systems. Daily produced documents include masking plans, field mapping tables, masking validation reports, and approval records. Data update cycles follow individual projects or project phases, with one data update completed after each full masking workflow. Data fields include sensitive field identifiers, masking rule codes, validation results, approval status, and more. There are no uniform fixed units; field values adjust based on specific project scenarios.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the sharing and embedding workflow
This category’s data contains sensitive fields and its sources involve internal systems. When sharing or embedding, access subjects must be strictly restricted via external business systems or commercial edition identity verification, and only internal operations and data security personnel are allowed access. Data updates follow individual project or batch cycles; connected knowledge bases or external business systems must support project-triggered data synchronization to avoid masking rule failures caused by cached expiration. Daily documents have diverse formats. The embedding link must rely on external business systems or knowledge bases to parse multiple document types, ensuring that masking plans, validation reports, and other content can be read normally. For internal ticket scenarios, external business systems must associate approval record fields. FastGPT’s sharing and embedding link only displays masked data. Permission control must be implemented via external business systems or commercial edition identity verification.
How to configure settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full share link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; business records and data permissions for data masking processing must still be handled by external systems |
| Share link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of data masking processing collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Validate availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Restricts access frequency for individual users; requires validation combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements apply, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a share link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for snippets, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity level of data masking processing materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission control |
| Conversation record validation | Test example: Prepare 10 data masking processing Q&A samples, check them in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearing |
Three common configuration mistakes
- Sharing entry for data masking processing fails to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period, then check browser request status; do not manually replace
shareId. - Visibility range of data masking processing data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same data masking processing Q&A is not visible on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser, and local identity status; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearing, so do not judge service anomalies solely based on this phenomenon.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Open the publish channel - no-login window page of the corresponding application, verify that the
shareIdin the share link matches the ID configured in the embedding module. - Use the corresponding share link to access the embedding page, validate that the sensitive field filtering rules configured by the connected external business system take effect, and unauthorized access cannot obtain embedded content.
- Trigger the document synchronization operation of the external business system or knowledge base, verify that the embedding module can load the latest masking plans, validation reports, and other content.
- Open the embedding page in different modern browsers, combine with the style configuration of the embedding carrier page, verify that page rendering is normal with no typesetting errors.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.