What the data for this category looks like
Text annotation project data typically comes from client-provided corpora, annotation results from internal annotation platforms, custom vocabularies, and feedback results from quality inspection sampling. Daily maintained documents include annotation specification documents, batch sample packages, quality inspection reports, and problem feedback forms. Data updates occur daily or synchronized per annotation batch. Document structures use primarily structured fields: text content, entity tags, intent classification, quality inspection markers, and more. All content focuses exclusively on semantics, entities, and intent, with no image-related fields.
What constraints these characteristics impose on sharing and embedding
The core data of text annotation projects centers on semantic tags, entities, and intent, with high update frequency. Sharing and embedding must therefore ensure data synchronization timeliness, to prevent embedded content from lagging behind latest annotation results. Documents include internal sensitive content such as annotation specifications, so access permissions must be restricted during sharing to stop unauthorized personnel from viewing annotation rules and sample details. Most fields for annotation projects are text-based. After embedding, adapt text display lengths for different scenarios to avoid content overflow or truncation that harms readability. Batch sample packages may have large data volumes, so loading performance must be considered during embedding. Limit content scale loaded in a single instance to prevent page freezes.
How to set configurations
The following configurations are based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full share link generated by the system, do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; business records and data permissions for text annotation projects still require handling by external systems |
| Share link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of collaboration cycles and revocation requirements for text annotation projects | Verifies availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits access frequency for a single user, requires verification combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a share link does not grant business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configuration for snippets, full text, or original text based on the sensitivity of text annotation project materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission controls |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 text annotation project Q&A samples, check in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity, retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three common errors
- Sharing entries related to text annotation projects fail to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period, then cross-check browser request statuses; do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of text annotation project data does not match expectations. Cross-check third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same text annotation project Q&A is not visible on another device. In anonymous scenarios, first verify device, browser, and local identity status; record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance, do not use this phenomenon alone to judge service abnormalities.
How to confirm proper configuration
- Open the embedded page, initiate a conversation related to operations tickets, refresh the page on the same device and browser, then check if previous conversation content and context are retained.
- Use an account that has not passed identity verification to access the share link, confirm that annotation-related content cannot be viewed normally (identity verification is only supported in the commercial edition).
- Wait for the cache duration matching the data update frequency to expire, refresh the page to check if the latest annotation data or updated specification content loads.
- View the browser console logs of the embedded page, confirm there are no loading timeout error messages.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.