What data for this category looks like
Core data for cybersecurity classified protection evaluation consulting is generated across the full lifecycle of protection projects. Sources include scan results exported from evaluation tools, on-site interview records, asset system inventories, and security device operation logs. Daily produced documents fall into four categories: classification determination reports, gap analysis reports, rectification plans, and evaluation reports. Each document is bound to a unique project identifier. Data update frequency follows individual project cycles, and is gradually supplemented during project advancement as materials are organized, gaps are verified, and rectification evidence is collected. After the project concludes, data is archived for long-term retention.
Constraints imposed on permission and data isolation
Cybersecurity protection project data includes regulatory-related security compliance information. Reports and log data from different projects must be strictly isolated to prevent cross-project leaks or unauthorized cross access. Single-project data update frequency is tied to the project cycle. Permission configurations must be dynamically adjusted during project initiation, advancement, and archiving to ensure access permissions at each stage match current work requirements. Multiple data sources correspond to different permission levels: evaluation tool logs must only be accessible to technical operations staff, interview records must only be visible to core project team members, and temporary data generated during rectification evidence collection must have temporary isolation rules to prevent unauthorized access.
How to set configurations
These configurations are based on FastGPT v4.17.0:
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
teamId | Exclusive team ID bound to a single classified protection project | Ensures project team members only access documents and log data for their assigned project |
tmbId | Exclusive identifier assigned by project role | Differentiates data access permission scopes for evaluators, operations staff, and compliance positions |
| Project document isolation rules | Split storage directories by document type | Isolates and stores different types of documents such as classification determination reports and rectification plans |
| Temporary data expiration time | 7 days | Automatically cleans up temporary rectification evidence data after project archiving |
| Abnormal access alert threshold | First 3 unauthorized access records | Initial threshold for triggering permission anomaly alerts, calibrated based on actual testing |
Three common misconfigurations
- Adding custom plugins to workflow nodes without input and output parameters, with no associated error logs. The cause is failure to bind plugin configurations for the corresponding project via
teamId, resulting in missing parameter loading context. - Cross-display of documents from different classified protection projects, posing compliance data leak risks. The cause is failure to split storage by document type for project document isolation rules, leading to insufficiently strict differentiation of storage paths across projects.
- Inability to access system data via unified identity authentication after local deployment. The cause is failure to configure team-level permission mapping rules, resulting in a mismatch between identities after SSO login and data permissions.
How to confirm configurations are correct
- Log in with accounts of different roles, verify that only documents and log data for the assigned project are accessible.
- Trigger workflow nodes with custom plugins, confirm that input and output parameters load and display normally.
- Submit simulated unauthorized access requests, verify that abnormal access alerts trigger correctly.
- View the temporary data storage directory, confirm that expired rectification evidence data has been automatically cleaned up.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.