What This Category's Data Looks Like
The data sources for this category include defect management systems, test reports, code commits, and user feedback. The update cadence is daily or per version. Daily documents include defect tickets, regression checklists, repair verification records, and defect statistical reports. Data fields include defect identifiers, priority, reproduction paths, associated versions, repair status, verification results, and more. Data is organized by project group and version, with different role responsibilities corresponding to different data access scopes.
Constraints Imposed on Permissions and Data Isolation
Defect data is organized by project group and version, with different role responsibilities matching different data access scopes. This requires strict alignment between roles and data scopes. The high-frequency daily or per-version update cadence requires permission configurations that can be adjusted quickly alongside version iterations. Sensitive data such as undisclosed high-priority defects and team performance-related statistical reports must restrict access from unauthorized members. Internal ticket Q&A involves cross-system data calls, so only authorized members can trigger retrieval and return of corresponding data.
Configuration Settings
This configuration applies to FastGPT v4.17.0. Specific configuration items are listed below:
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Team Permission Binding | Associate with teamId to match the current project group | Defect data is stored by project group and version, aligning with the organizational logic of business data |
| Role Permission Configuration | Associate tmbId to bind role permissions | Corresponds to the responsibility scopes of roles such as QA, development leads, and version managers |
| Knowledge Base Association Scope | Only bind current project defect tickets and regression checklists | Prevents cross-project data leaks and meets the requirements of operational on-call scenarios |
| Access Log Retention | Retain for 30 days | Meets internal audit requirements and supports version traceability for defect management |
| Permission Check Timing | Before each Q&A request | Ensures real-time blocking of unauthorized access and adapts to high-frequency Q&A scenarios |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: Unauthorized accounts can view defect ticket data from other projects, and returned results include unassociated regression checklists. Cause: The knowledge base association scope is not restricted via
teamId, leading to cross-project data leaks. - Symptom: When an intern account initiates internal ticket Q&A, a "no access permission" prompt appears. Cause: The intern account is not bound to the current project's
teamId, and only basic access permissions are configured. - Symptom: When a member attempts to create an internal ticket Q&A, a "insufficient permissions" prompt appears. Cause: The member's write permissions are not configured via
tmbId, and only read-only access is enabled.
How to Confirm Successful Configuration
- Use an unauthorized account to initiate a Q&A containing defect ticket keywords, confirm that no unauthorized defect data is included in the returned results.
- Navigate to the permission configuration page, confirm that the
teamIdassociated with the current account matches the current project'steamId. - Attempt to create a new internal ticket Q&A, confirm that accounts with write permissions can submit normally.
- View access logs, confirm that every Q&A request triggers permission checks, with no records of skipped checks.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against your own specific samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.