This document applies to FastGPT v4.17.0.
What This Category of Data Looks Like
Core data for supply chain security and open source dependency governance comes from four sources: package managers, code repositories, vulnerability databases, and license databases. Update frequency is daily or upon each version release. Daily produced documents include four types: SBOM lists, dependency risk reports, license lists, and repair work orders. Fields include standardized dependency package names, version numbers, CVE IDs, license types, risk levels, repair statuses, and more. All fields follow industry-standard open source governance data formats, with no custom non-standard fields.
Constraints Imposed on Forms and Interactions
Since data sources are scattered and update frequencies are high, external systems must implement batch import and scheduled synchronization of multi-source data to avoid errors from manual input. Document fields have high standardization, so external business systems must provide preset options to restrict invalid input, reducing error rates in subsequent governance links. Errors in supply chain security scenarios have severe consequences, so external business systems or subsequent workflows must implement keyword field verification logic. External permission controls must restrict sensitive operations to prevent unauthorized personnel from modifying governance data. The most time-consuming dependency identification and matching link requires external systems to implement step-by-step filling guidance and template loading functions separately, improving document drafting efficiency.
How to Configure Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Practice | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form input node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from supply chain security and open source dependency governance fields as required inputs; actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input; when required items are missing, interaction status must be checked to avoid subsequent nodes failing to obtain complete input |
User selection node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; queries and filtering of supply chain security and open source dependency governance related records must be implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Field passing after submission | Test example: Prepare 10 supply chain security and open source dependency governance input samples, covering complete filling, missing required items, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined by actual tasks |
| External implementation item: Form layout | Must be implemented separately by external systems; use multi-field column layout, divided into dependency identification, risk assessment, and compliance check columns | Match the standard field structure of SBOM lists, improving logical coherence of document drafting |
| External implementation item: Enumeration value configuration | Must be implemented separately by external systems; use standardized enumeration values for license types, risk levels, and repair status provided by external business systems | Match public enumeration formats of vulnerability databases and license databases, reducing manual input errors |
| External implementation item: Single import limit | Must be implemented separately by external systems; first 500 dependency records | Test example value, used to verify the carrying capacity of batch import interfaces |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- External field verification logic is not configured, and non-standard format CVE IDs or dependency package names are manually entered, resulting in generated documents that cannot be imported into third-party governance tools. The cause is that the verification logic for corresponding fields is not implemented.
- The single import limit is set to the first 2000 dependency records, triggering backend interface current limiting and returning empty results. The cause is that the conventional data volume threshold of backend processing is not matched.
- Standardized enumeration values provided by external business systems are not used, and custom license types are manually entered, resulting in compliance reports that do not match actual licenses. The cause is that industry-standard field format requirements are not followed.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Manually enter a dependency package name and CVE ID that conform to standard formats, trigger the external field verification logic, and confirm that the verification logic works normally.
- Configure an external data source synchronization task, wait for the synchronization cycle to end, and confirm that the latest data from external data sources has been successfully pulled into the form.
- Confirm that the form layout provided by the external system can normally display the configured fields, and preset field filling meets requirements.
- Submit an external batch import test task, import 50 standard dependency records, and confirm that the task executes normally without errors.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.