What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category primarily comes from customer business requirements, publicly available compliant data sources, self-developed collection tools, and internal sample libraries. Daily produced documents include four categories: collection plans, sample specification descriptions, authorization compliance statements, and task scheduling tables. Data updates follow individual project cycles, or adjust sample scope and field requirements on a weekly synchronization basis. Core fields cover sample coverage boundaries, data item format definitions, compliance check rules, and execution time nodes. Sample volume is measured in units of single collected data entries, and task cycles are measured in natural days.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Forms and Interactions
Fields for sample coverage scope must support multi-dimensional selection and text supplementation, as customer requirements often include cross-business line sample filtering conditions. Data item format definitions must match the field rules of different data sources, so preset format templates must be provided by external business systems or subsequent nodes. FastGPT's formInput node supports receiving user-defined input content and passing it to subsequent nodes. Compliance check rules must link with the authorization declaration module via external business systems or subsequent nodes to avoid compliance risks from empty fields. The task scheduling form must support time interval selection. Dependency association logic must be implemented by external business systems or subsequent nodes to avoid time conflicts during parallel multi-tasks. Additionally, the data update frequency requirement means the form must retain a temporary modification entry, eliminating the need to recreate a complete task.
Configuration Settings
The following configurations must be implemented in conjunction with FastGPT form interaction nodes, and relevant business logic must be supplemented by external systems or subsequent nodes.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form Input Node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from the data collection task design fields as required inputs; actual fields are determined per task | This node collects user input; missing required inputs require checking interaction status to prevent subsequent nodes from receiving incomplete input |
User Selection Node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, verify corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; querying and filtering records related to data collection task design must be implemented via subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Post-Submission Field Passing | Test example: Prepare 10 input samples for data collection task design, covering complete filling, missing required items, and cancellation operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined per actual task |
| External Implementation Item: Sample Scope Selector | Must be implemented separately by external systems; supports multi-tag selection + custom text input, covering more than 5 business dimensions | Matches customer multi-dimensional sample filtering requirements |
| External Implementation Item: Compliance Check Trigger Configuration | Must be implemented separately by external systems; implemented by external business systems or subsequent nodes to trigger check interception before form submission | Proactively avoids sample infringement risks |
| External Implementation Item: Task Scheduling Settings | Must be implemented separately by external systems; supports natural day interval selection, maximum 30 days per single configuration | Adapts to weekly update rhythms for individual projects |
Three Common Errors
- Symptom: An error stating "Sample scope does not match compliance requirements" appears after form submission. Verification steps: Check whether the external compliance check trigger link has been configured, confirm whether invalid sample fields have been intercepted.
- Symptom: Data collection task field formats do not meet customer expectations, and the number of results is insufficient. Verification steps: Check whether the external custom format rule configuration entry has been enabled, confirm that it can match customer special field requirements.
- Symptom: Form-related model configurations do not meet expectations. Verification steps: Check whether the linkage logic between model selection and compliance check has been configured, confirm that the linkage function operates normally.
How to Confirm Successful Configuration
- Submit a test form for sample scope, verify whether the external compliance check logic triggers interception after form submission, confirm that the check function operates normally.
- Edit custom data fields, enter content that meets business requirements, verify whether saving is successful, confirm that format configuration takes effect; character length limits must be tested separately.
- Configure cross-week task scheduling, verify whether the time interval selection function operates normally; dependency association logic must be verified by external systems or subsequent nodes.
- Enter the editing page of a submitted task, attempt to modify the sample scope, verify whether the external editing entry function operates normally, confirm that saving is possible without recreating the task.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.