Supplier and Process Quality Audit for Mold Design and Manufacturing: Document Parsing and Chunking

Typical entities include injection molding, stamping, and die casting mold enterprises, as well as mold centers of manufacturing enterprises. Daily

What This Category of Data Looks Like

Typical entities include injection molding, stamping, and die casting mold enterprises, as well as mold centers of manufacturing enterprises. Daily generated documents include mold design task sheets, DFM reports, part drawings, processing process cards, mold trial reports, mold modification notices, and mold history records. Data comes from customer product models, mold flow or forming simulation files, CAD/CAM outputs, machining and measurement data, and mold trial samples. Documents are updated per project. New versions are generated for each mold trial or modification. Some documents contain structured parameters, drawing images, and process descriptions.

Mold documents have multiple formats and structures. They include plain text process cards and PDF reports with embedded CAD drawings. Parsing must adapt to different content types. The update rhythm tied to projects and mold trial iterations requires chunking to retain document version association information, to avoid confusion across versions. Core audit parameters such as demolding, shrinkage, and assembly accuracy are included in documents. Chunking must not split key parameters from their associated context. Some documents contain large numbers of tables and images. Multi-vector parsing and image content extraction must be supported, otherwise key audit basis will be lost.

Configuration Settings

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
chunkSize800–1200 charactersMold documents contain a large number of process parameters and section descriptions. This length preserves the association between parameters and their context, avoiding damage to logical structure during chunking
customPdfParseEnabledMold documents often include PDF files with embedded images exported from CAD and screenshots of mold trial reports. Enhanced parsing is required to extract image and text content
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS300–600 secondsParsing large mold project CAD assembly files takes a long time. This range covers the parsing duration of most projects
chunkSplitterSplit by heading + paragraphMold documents have clear section divisions. Splitting by heading preserves the independent audit logic of each section
chunkSettingModeManual modeDocument structures vary widely across different mold projects. Manual configuration can adapt to different types of audit documents
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE1000 MBLarge mold CAD assembly files may have large sizes. This upper limit meets the upload needs of most projects

Three Common Mistakes

  • Scenario: After uploading a mold document that includes part drawings, the parsing result only shows blank content or no image descriptions. Cause: The customPdfParse configuration is not enabled. The default parsing method cannot extract image content embedded in PDF files.
  • Scenario: After deploying MinerU locally, the enhanced PDF parsing function is enabled but parsing still fails. Cause: The API address and port of MinerU are not configured in FastGPT's parsing service, or the corresponding port is not open in the local firewall.
  • Scenario: The row and column association information of tables is lost in the parsed process card documents. Cause: Multi-vector support is not enabled, and the context structure of the table is not retained during chunking, making it impossible to associate corresponding parameters during audit.

How to Confirm the Configuration Is Correct

  • Upload a mold trial report PDF including CAD drawings, and verify whether the parsing result extracts image descriptions and report text.
  • Check the knowledge base settings in FastGPT v4.17.0, confirm that the customPdfParse option is enabled, or the corresponding English parameter is configured to the enabled state.
  • Upload a mold CAD export file of approximately 500 MB, confirm that the parsing task is not terminated due to timeout.
  • View the parsed chunking results, confirm that table data is completely split and retains row and column association information.

The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.