What this category of data looks like
Data typically originates from customer product models, mold flow or forming simulation files, CAD/CAM files, machining and measurement data, and trial mold samples. Daily documents include mold design task sheets, DFM reports, part drawings, machining process cards, trial mold reports, mold modification notices, and mold records.
Data updates are triggered per individual project and synchronized after each trial mold or mold modification. Documents include fields such as mold number, part tolerance, demolding angle, and machining parameters. There is no unified fixed unit, with adjustments made based on the process requirements of the corresponding part.
What constraints these characteristics impose on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems
Because data is updated per individual project and synchronized after each trial mold or mold modification, HTTP interfaces must support dynamically pulling the latest version of documents using project-specific unique identifiers. This prevents mold modification errors or production delays caused by calling outdated data.
Because daily documents include professional fields such as mold number, part tolerance, and demolding angle, interface parameters must support precise matching queries for specific process parameters.
Because document types are diverse, interfaces must support parsing requests for multiple formats including CAD files, process card PDFs, and trial mold reports.
Because updates have no fixed cycle, interfaces should not rely on periodic caching, and must support real-time data synchronization.
In addition, errors in mold design and manufacturing directly affect production milestones. Interfaces must have clear error feedback mechanisms to facilitate rapid troubleshooting.
How to configure the setup
This document is written based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Interface Timeout | 600 seconds | Mold process documents include complex machining parameters and trial mold data, requiring sufficient time for parsing and matching |
Authorization | Carry project-specific access tokens | Ensure the interface only allows authorized access to exclusive data for the corresponding mold project, preventing cross-project data leaks |
variables | Pass mold number and target part model | Accurately locate the corresponding process specifications and technical standard content, narrowing the query scope |
| Number of documents returned per request | Top 3 | The number of associated documents for a single mold project is limited; excessive returns will increase interface transmission load |
responseData | Only return matched process fields and document summaries | Reduce invalid data transmission and improve interface response and processing efficiency |
| Context Window Size | 800–1200 characters | Match the typical paragraph length of mold process documents, avoiding truncation of critical machining parameters |
Three common configuration mistakes
- Phenomenon: The interface returns a 401 Unauthorized error. Cause: The
Authorizationparameter is not configured correctly, and the exclusive access token for the corresponding mold project is not carried. - Phenomenon: After referencing HTTP response content in a workflow, the AI-generated answer does not match the target process content. Cause: Key query parameters such as mold number and part model are not passed via
variables, resulting in an overly broad query scope. - Phenomenon: The interface call has no response for a long time and triggers a timeout. Cause: The interface timeout period is not set appropriately, and the time required to parse complex trial mold reports and process cards exceeds the default configuration.
How to confirm the configuration is correct
- Call the interface with the
variablesparameter for a known mold project, and check if the returned results include target document content such as machining process cards and trial mold reports for the corresponding project. - Verify that the
Authorizationparameter is configured correctly, and no unauthorized error is returned when calling the interface. - Initiate multiple consecutive calls, confirm that the interface response time meets business requirements, and no frequent timeouts occur.
- Check the output of the HTTP node in the workflow, and confirm that the returned content has been correctly passed to the AI context link.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.