What the Data for This Category Looks Like
This category of data typically comes from customer-delivered product models, mold flow or forming simulation results, CAD/CAM exported files, machining and measurement records, and trial mold sample parameters. Daily maintenance is carried out on a per-project basis, with corresponding documents updated after each trial mold or mold modification. Core documents include mold design task sheets, DFM reports, part drawings, machining process cards, trial mold reports, mold modification notices, and mold history records. Most fields involve professional engineering information such as geometric dimensions (units: mm, μm), forming parameters (units: degrees, MPa), and machining timelines.
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on the "Tool Calling and Plugins" Link
The data for this category is multi-source and heterogeneous, including 2D drawings, 3D models, structured process cards, and unstructured trial mold reports. Tool calling must support multi-format file parsing and structured field extraction, and can automatically match corresponding tools via the toolChoice configuration. The frequency of data updates fluctuates with project iterations, with document updates triggered each time a mold is trialed or modified. Tool calling must support real-time pulling of the latest version of associated documents. The uniqueness of professional engineering fields requires tools to accurately recognize terms such as draft angle, shrinkage rate, and machining tolerance. Plugins must interface with standardized term mapping rules for the mold field to avoid review deviations. Additionally, cross-document associated review requirements mean tools must link task sheets, trial mold reports, and mold modification notices to complete cross-checks.
Configuration Settings
This configuration is based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow/API tool selection | Auto | Matches the multi-tool linkage needs of mold design review, and can automatically call corresponding parsing or verification tools based on document type |
| Single tool call timeout | 120 seconds | Mold documents include complex 3D model parsing and simulation data verification, so sufficient processing time must be reserved |
| Tool call result cache duration | 24 hours | The document update frequency within a single project cycle does not exceed once per day, so caching can avoid resource occupation from repeated calls |
| Workflow/API function-call configuration | Enable structured output | Ensures review results are output categorized by mold professional fields, facilitating subsequent cross-comparison with process cards and trial mold reports |
| Concurrent number of multi-tool calls | 2–3 | Prevents resource overload from parsing multiple 3D models simultaneously, and can be adjusted based on actual measurements |
| Maximum number of entries returned by tool calls | Top 10 | Adapts to the number of conventional review items for mold documents, avoiding redundant returned content |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- No search results are returned after the tool call module is connected to the knowledge base, and the interface shows the knowledge base fields are empty. The cause is that the context binding between tool calls and the knowledge base is not configured in the workflow, and only the tool is called separately without associating the document library of the corresponding project.
- The tool call module has no execution action, and the status shows not triggered. The cause is that no trigger condition is set, or the trigger condition does not match the upload or update event of mold documents.
- The tool call continuously returns segmented streaming responses, and stream output cannot be turned off. The cause is that the stream return switch is not turned off in the configuration, and the default streaming output setting is retained.
How to Verify the Configuration Is Correct
- Upload a latest trial mold report to trigger tool calls, and check whether the returned results include review content for professional engineering fields such as draft angle and shrinkage rate.
- View the tool call logs to confirm that the trigger timing matches the document upload or update event, and there are no timeout error records.
- Verify the structured output format of the tool call results, whether they are displayed categorized by mold professional fields to facilitate cross-checks.
- Upload two different versions of mold modification notices, and check whether the tool can associate and compare the difference content between the two documents.
All configuration values listed here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples and operational requirements.