Tendering Document and Quotation Preparation for Cement Clinker and Grinding: Document Parsing and Chunking

Business data for cement clinker and grinding comes from online composition analysis systems, DCS control systems, laboratories, kiln and grinding

This document is based on FastGPT v4.17.0.

What the data for this category looks like

Business data for cement clinker and grinding comes from online composition analysis systems, DCS control systems, laboratories, kiln and grinding equipment, raw fuel ledgers, and energy metering devices. Document types include raw material batching plans, kiln operation records, test reports, quality control notices, equipment inspection records, and energy reports. Update frequencies cover real-time, shift-based, and daily. Documents contain proportional fields (such as limestone ratio %), temperature fields (such as kiln cylinder temperature ℃), flow fields (such as feed rate t/h), and multi-column tabular composition test data. Document structures vary significantly across types.

What constraints these characteristics impose on document parsing and chunking

Cross-system data from multiple sources and widely varying document structures require the parsing pipeline to adapt to documents with different update frequencies. Real-time equipment inspection records require finer-grained chunking to ensure retrieval timeliness. Daily or monthly energy reports can use slightly larger chunks to reduce retrieval overhead. Multi-column tabular test data requires the parsing pipeline to support complete table structure recognition to avoid missing fields. Differences in hierarchical structures across document types require chunking logic to match natural boundaries between headings and paragraphs, avoiding truncation of critical business information.

How to set the configurations

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
chunkSize800–1200 charactersAdapts to the mixed structure of cement clinker-related documents, balancing information completeness and retrieval accuracy
chunkSplitterSplit by paragraph + headingMatches the hierarchical structure of raw material batching plans and kiln operation records, avoiding truncation of critical business parameters
customPdfParseEnable full table recognition modeAdapts to multi-column composition data tables in test reports and quality control notices, avoiding missing fields
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS300 secondsAddresses parsing time for kiln operation records and monthly energy reports with more than 10 pages
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE100 MBMeets upload requirements for large annual raw fuel ledgers and quarterly energy reports
chunkSettingModeManual configurationAdjust chunking parameters for different document types such as inspection records and monthly reports

Three common mistakes

  • Scenario: After uploading a test report PDF, the parsing result only displays the first three columns of table data. Cause: Full table recognition mode for customPdfParse is not enabled, and only default visible columns are extracted.
  • Scenario: After uploading a kiln operation record with more than 10 pages, the parsing node shows a timeout status. Cause: The value set for PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS is lower than the actual parsing time of the document.
  • Scenario: Chunked content for a raw material batching plan is truncated mid-batching ratio. Cause: The chunkSize setting is too small, and heading-based chunking logic is not enabled.

How to verify correct configuration

  • Upload a typical test report PDF, and confirm the parsing result includes all composition data columns in full.
  • Upload a kiln operation record with more than 10 pages, and confirm parsing time does not exceed the value set for PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS.
  • Upload short-duration equipment inspection records and long-duration monthly energy reports separately, and verify chunk lengths adapt to different document types.
  • Check the total size of uploaded documents, and confirm it does not exceed the UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE limit.

The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.