What data for this category looks like
Data for equipment inspection and preventive maintenance comes from EAM/CMMS systems, equipment sensor data, operator inspection records, maintenance work order history, spare parts inventory lists, special equipment inspection records, and more. Data updates cover scenarios such as shift-based patrols, weekly/monthly maintenance plans, and real-time reporting during unexpected faults. Daily documents include equipment ledgers, inspection sheets, maintenance plans, maintenance work orders, failure analysis reports, spare parts lists, and special equipment inspection records. Fields include equipment number, inspection item, inspection result, spare part code, inventory quantity, inspection validity period, and more. Field formats must be split and adapted for specific operation and maintenance scenarios.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the forms and interactions link
Multi-source data requires forms to support structured field mapping across multiple systems, to avoid errors caused by manual entry. Different update frequencies require forms to be configured with time-segmented data source synchronization rules, to balance the needs of daily patrols and real-time responses to unexpected faults. Multiple document types require forms to be configured in blocks by document scenario, distinguishing different form structures for inspection plans, quotation lists, inspection reports, and more. Strict potential consequences of errors require forms to add mandatory validation rules, to ensure no missing key fields and avoid risks such as unplanned downtime and safety accidents.
How to set the configuration
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Bind structured fields of equipment ledgers and inspection sheets, limit single field length to under 800 characters | The core data of this category is structured operation and maintenance documents; direct field mapping reduces manual entry errors |
userSelect | Display selectable users grouped by maintenance team and equipment type, use the top 10 commonly used roles | Bid scenarios require clear responsible entities; grouped selection improves operation efficiency |
| Data source synchronization cycle | Synchronize once per shift, synchronize in real time when a fault occurs | Match the update frequency of category data, balance daily operation and maintenance and emergency scenarios |
| Form validation rules | Mandatory fields include special equipment inspection validity period, spare part inventory margin | Avoid maintenance delays caused by overdue statutory inspections and insufficient spare parts |
| Multi-document association configuration | Associate association fields between maintenance work orders and spare parts lists | Ensure that bid quotations match actual maintenance resources and historical work order data |
Three common misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: A [Message receiving address verification failed] prompt appears when configuring a form callback interface. Cause: The callback address is not ensured to be accessible over the public network, or the SSL certificate verification option is not set correctly.
- Phenomenon: When binding a locally deployed large model, the target model cannot be found in the provider list. Cause: Access parameters for the custom model provider are not added to the configuration file.
- Phenomenon: Audio or video tags added to the form cannot be displayed properly. Cause: Rich text rendering configuration is not enabled in FastGPT v4.17.0, or the entered tag format does not comply with standard specifications.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Test form submission, check whether structured data from equipment ledgers and spare parts inventory can be correctly pulled and displayed normally.
- Simulate a fault occurrence scenario, check whether the data source can synchronize and update the corresponding fields in the form in real time.
- Try to submit a form with mandatory fields left blank, confirm that the validation rules take effect and display corresponding prompt messages.
- View the SSL certificate verification option, confirm that it matches the certificate configuration of the deployment environment.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.