What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data sources for this category include MES systems, online testing equipment, laboratory test records, process parameter ledgers, customer quality standards, and historical defect databases. Data update cadence follows real-time collection per production batch or per shift, or continuous synchronization at inspection nodes. Daily documents include control plans, patrol inspection records, SPC statistical reports, final product inspection reports, nonconforming product review forms, release approval forms, and quality monthly reports. Core fields include inspection item number, inspection result value, batch identifier, equipment code, defect type code, and release permission marker. No fixed percentage-based statistical fields are included.
Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Forms and Interactions
Multi-source data access requires forms to support cross-system field auto-mapping, to avoid duplicate data entry. High-frequency update cadence requires forms to include built-in real-time validation rules, to block inputs that do not meet inspection logic. Diverse document types require forms to offer template switching functions, to adapt to field layouts for different scenarios such as control plans and inspection reports. Specific coded fields require preset optional values, to reduce manual input error rates. Permission constraints in the release link require forms to integrate role validation. Only users with corresponding permissions may submit or modify approval statuses.
Configuration Settings
The following configurations are based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Set inspection item number, number of qualified items, and number of defective items as required fields, and limit the value range to non-negative integers | Matches the legal requirements of the category's core business fields and aligns with business logic |
userSelect | Preset three fixed options: qualified, unqualified, and pending review | Corresponds to the standard judgment rules for final product release, reducing manual input errors |
| Template switching settings | Provide three preset templates: control plan, inspection report, and release form | Adapt to the bidding and quotation preparation needs of multiple document types within this category |
| Real-time validation configuration | Enable field legal validation, set the timeout threshold to 10 seconds | Matches the data validation requirements of high-frequency updates, avoiding long waiting times |
| Permission binding configuration | Associate two roles: quality engineer and release approver | Complies with permission control rules for the release link, preventing unauthorized operations |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- No prompt popup appears when calling the API to access published form interactions. The cause is that the frontend rendering switch for
formInputoruserSelectwas not enabled in the workflow configuration, and only backend data storage was set up. - Form fields are not populated with preset options, and custom invalid values appear. The cause is that the fixed option restriction for
userSelectwas not enabled, allowing free input that does not comply with business coding rules. - No validation error is triggered after form submission, causing nonconforming data to flow into subsequent links. The cause is that the real-time validation switch was not enabled, and only delayed backend validation was relied on.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Open the workflow editing page and check whether the
formInputanduserSelectcomponents are bound to the category's core business fields. - Test submitting the form to verify that a popup with preset judgment options appears, with no custom input entry.
- Simulate accessing the form with a role that does not have permissions, confirming that field content cannot be modified or submitted.
- Enter an invalid numerical value (such as a negative number of qualified items) to verify that a real-time validation prompt pops up.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.