What this category’s data includes
This category covers safety, environmental protection and operations management documents from EHS departments and maintenance teams of manufacturing enterprises including chemical and metallurgical plants. Included documents are risk identification lists, hot work/confined space/lifting work permits, online monitoring records, hazardous waste ledgers, emission monitoring reports, and accident and hidden danger rectification reports. Data sources include industry regulations and standards, online environmental monitoring equipment, gas detectors, personnel qualification files, equipment isolation lists, and supervision platforms. Data updates align with single operation completion, real-time monitoring cycles, or regular inspection schedules. Document fields include operation start and end times (accurate to the minute), gas concentration values (ppm), personnel qualification numbers, isolated equipment identifiers, and other fields required for compliance verification of operations.
Constraints imposed on tool calling and plugins
Data sources for this category are scattered, with significant format differences across sources. Tool calling must connect to multiple data sources simultaneously, including online monitoring equipment, personnel qualification files, and supervision platforms. Plugins adapted for parsing multi-format data must be configured. Real-time data from single operations and batch data from regular inspections follow different update rhythms. Tool triggering must align with operation process nodes to prevent repeated calls or missed key steps. Document fields must cover all necessary items for compliance verification. Tool calling must extract and verify fields such as operation time, gas concentration, and personnel qualifications. It must also adapt to document structures for different operation types, to ensure verification logic covers all compliance requirements.
Configuration settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow/API tool selection | auto | Adapts to automatic tool selection across different operation scenarios, covering tasks such as risk identification and qualification verification |
| Workflow/API function-call configuration | Enabled | Ensures the model calls tools strictly according to preset tool parameters, avoiding unstructured results that do not meet compliance requirements |
| Tool call timeout | 600 seconds | Matches the average response time of gas monitoring data uploads and qualification database queries |
| Single-round tool call retry count | 2 times | Balances interface call success rate and response speed of operation processes |
| Multi-source data merging rule | Associated by work permit number | Matches the unique identifier field of documents in this category, ensuring accurate data integration |
Note: The configurations on this page apply to FastGPT v4.17.0
Three common configuration mistakes
- A 400 status code (no body) is returned when calling an online monitoring interface. The cause is failure to include the operation type and work permit number as request parameters as required by the interface documentation. The interface cannot locate the corresponding monitoring data.
- No compliance verification tool exclusive to this category is bound when configuring
functionCall. This causes function calls generated by the large model to omit key verification items such as personnel qualifications and equipment isolation, leading to poor call performance. - No exception verification logic for tool calls is configured. When hazardous waste ledger data returned by tools differs from online monitoring data, no alarm is triggered.
How to verify successful configuration
- Initiate a simulated hot work operation tool call process, and confirm whether the tool automatically calls the gas detector interface, personnel qualification database interface, and work permit verification plugin.
- Review tool call logs to confirm that returned results include required fields such as operation time, gas concentration, and personnel qualifications, and that the format meets document requirements.
- Simulate a scenario where interface requests fail due to temporary network fluctuations, and confirm whether the preset retry mechanism is triggered.
- Compare compliance verification results returned by the tool with manually verified results, to confirm that the logic matches.
Additional note: The configuration values listed here are common starting points. Adjustments should be made based on specific samples.