Inspection and Process Record Audit for Mold Design and Manufacturing: Document Parsing and Chunking

Daily data from injection molding, stamping, and die-casting mold enterprises, as well as mold centers of manufacturing enterprises. Sources include

What data looks like for this category

Daily data from injection molding, stamping, and die-casting mold enterprises, as well as mold centers of manufacturing enterprises. Sources include customer product models, mold flow simulation files, CAD/CAM output files, machining and measurement data, and records related to trial mold samples. Data is updated per project, with new documents generated after each trial mold or mold modification. Typical documents include mold design task sheets, DFM reports, part drawings, processing technology cards, trial mold reports, mold modification notices, and mold records. These documents contain fields such as mold number, number of cavities, material grade, hardness, and trial mold defect description. Units include millimeters, megapascals, hours, and other standard units.

What constraints these characteristics impose on document parsing and chunking

Mold design and manufacturing documents have diverse types: structured process sheets, semi-structured trial mold reports, and formatted drawings exported from CAD. General-purpose parsing logic cannot reliably extract information from all these formats. Documents are updated per project and revised across multiple trial mold cycles. Chunking must preserve contextual connections within the same project, to avoid splitting defect records across trial mold stages. Specific business fields such as mold number and number of cavities must be accurately located, and chunking must not truncate these critical parameters. Document volume varies widely, from mold modification notices of several KB to complete project packages of tens of MB. This creates varying requirements for resource consumption and processing duration during parsing and chunking.

How to set configurations

This guidance is written for FastGPT v4.17.0.

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
chunkSize800–1200 charactersMold documents mix structured parameters and unstructured descriptions. This range balances the integrity of information per chunk and retrieval accuracy
chunkSplitterSplit by paragraph + title boundaryMold documents have clear chapter divisions. Splitting by paragraph retains semantic integrity and avoids truncating business logic
customPdfParseEnabledMold design documents are mostly formatted PDFs exported from CAD. Enabling custom parsing accurately extracts table and annotation information
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS600 secondsLarge mold project document packages have significant volume. Parsing requires a longer duration to avoid mid-process timeout interruptions
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE1000 MBComplete mold project document collections may include multiple CAD files and reports. Larger file uploads must be supported

Three common configuration errors

  • Symptom: After uploading mold project documents, the interface displays a total chunk count exceeding 3000, and indexing fails to complete. Cause: The chunkSize parameter was not adjusted to match the project granularity of the documents. Default chunking parameters produce overly small chunks, and large-volume documents were not split per project.
  • Symptom: After uploading a CSV-format processing technology card, parsing results show field misalignment or missing fields. Cause: The chunkSplitter logic was not adjusted for structured table documents. The default chunking logic does not recognize the column structure of CSV files, leading to chaotic information splitting.
  • Symptom: The system returns a timeout error when parsing large mold design PDF files. Cause: The PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS setting is lower than the actual required parsing duration, and the timeout parameter was not adjusted for large-volume documents.

How to verify correct configuration

  • Upload a single typical mold document, such as a trial mold report, and review the parsed chunk list to confirm the chunk count aligns with business expectations.
  • Upload a structured table document, such as a processing technology card, and check the parsing results to confirm fields are not misaligned and are fully extracted.
  • Upload the largest-volume project document package, and confirm that the upload and parsing processes do not trigger timeout errors.
  • Adjust the chunkSize parameter, then compare parsing results across different chunk lengths to confirm that information integrity meets requirements.

The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the user's own samples.