Equipment Inspection and Maintenance Q&A for Heat Treatment: Document Parsing and Chunking

Typical subjects include professional heat treatment plants and heat treatment workshops in automotive and bearing parts factories. Daily documents

What Data Looks Like for This Category

Typical subjects include professional heat treatment plants and heat treatment workshops in automotive and bearing parts factories. Daily documents cover heat treatment process cards, charging diagrams, furnace temperature curves, hardness and metallographic reports, equipment inspection forms, and abnormal disposal records. Data sources include material grades, customer technical requirements, temperature control instruments, furnace temperature uniformity testing equipment, hardness testers and metallographic equipment, and MES systems. Data is updated per heat batch or per production batch. Documents contain fields such as heating, holding, and cooling schedules, charging positions, furnace temperature curves, and hardness and metallographic test results. Some documents include quantitative units such as temperature, time, and hardness values.

What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on the Document Parsing and Chunking Stage

Heat treatment scenario documents have diverse types: text-based process cards, chart-based furnace temperature curves and metallographic images, and table-based inspection forms. Different document formats have varying adaptability requirements for parsing tools. The per-heat-batch data update frequency requires the parsing process to support real-time and batch processing, to avoid delaying response speeds for inspection and maintenance. Fields within documents are strongly linked to business operations. When chunking, context logic must be preserved. For example, charging positions and their corresponding furnace temperature curves cannot be split into different chunks, as this will reduce the accuracy of subsequent maintenance Q&A. Additionally, data from multiple sources requires a unified parsing format to ensure consistent processing of documents exported from different equipment.

How to Configure Settings

This configuration is based on FastGPT v4.17.0.

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
chunkSize800–1200 charactersHeat treatment documents contain continuous process parameters and equipment inspection items. This range balances context completeness and chunk granularity
chunkSplitterSeparate by paragraph + headingHeat treatment documents have clear process steps and equipment inspection item headings. Following this chunking rule preserves business logic associations
customPdfParseEnabledAdapts to PDF documents in heat treatment scenarios such as furnace temperature curves and metallographic reports with charts, and extracts non-text data
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS300–600 secondsParsing large furnace temperature curve PDFs or multi-document collections takes significant time. This range prevents parsing failures due to timeouts
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE500 MBMeets the upload requirements for multi-document collections per heat batch, and adapts to batch processing scenarios
chunkSettingModeManual configurationHeat treatment documents have diverse structures. Manual adjustment allows adaptation to different file types such as process cards, inspection forms, and curve reports

Three Common Configuration Mistakes

  • After uploading image files of charging diagrams or image fragments from furnace temperature curve PDFs, the parsing result lacks corresponding equipment position or temperature data. Cause: The customPdfParse configuration is not enabled. The default parsing logic cannot extract non-text data from images.
  • After deploying FastGPT locally and enabling enhanced PDF parsing, the local MinerU interface cannot be called. Cause: The MinerU API address and port are not correctly configured in the knowledge base settings, or the port is not open to external access.
  • After parsing table data from heat treatment inspection forms, multi-vector support cannot be enabled. Cause: The multi-vector support option for table data is not checked in the knowledge base settings, or the chunk configuration does not adapt to the row and column structure of tables.

How to Verify Proper Configuration

  • Upload a single heat treatment process card PDF, and check if the parsing result retains the complete paragraph content of the heating, holding, and cooling schedules.
  • Upload a PDF file containing a furnace temperature curve, and check if the parsing result includes the curve's temperature data and timeline information.
  • Enable enhanced PDF parsing in the knowledge base settings, and use the curl tool to test the MinerU interface, confirming that the return status code is 200.
  • Adjust the chunkSize parameter, upload a long document, and check if the character count of each chunk falls within the set range.

The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.