Quality Problem Traceability and Defect Analysis for Non-Ferrous Metal Smelting and Electrolysis: Workflow Orchestration

Data for this category typically comes from concentrate and auxiliary material analysis reports, production DCS systems, electrolyzer voltage and

What this category of data looks like

Data for this category typically comes from concentrate and auxiliary material analysis reports, production DCS systems, electrolyzer voltage and current monitoring, laboratory test results, energy and environmental monitoring equipment. Documents such as batching sheets, smelting records, electrolyzer condition records, test reports, anode and cathode quality records, and environmental protection ledgers are routinely retained. Data updates are triggered by production batches: corresponding records are generated for each batch of raw materials, each furnace, or each electrolyzer. Real-time data such as electrolyzer conditions, voltage, and current are updated synchronously. Fields include component proportions, furnace temperature, tank current, batch number, test time, and more. There is no unified fixed format.

The multi-source and heterogeneous data characteristics require workflow orchestration to adapt to data sources of different formats, and configure cross-system data pulling and format conversion nodes. For data sources with different update frequencies, trigger logic must be distinguished: real-time electrolyzer condition data requires event-triggered or fixed-period polling, while batch-type smelting and test data are executed triggered by furnace heats or batches. At the same time, quality traceability requires linking data across multiple links, so the workflow must include a link for connecting abnormal data chains, aligning furnace conditions, tank parameters, test results, and environmental protection ledgers to ensure that defect analysis covers all production links.

How to set the configuration

The following configurations are formulated based on FastGPT v4.17.0.

Configuration ItemRecommended ApproachBasis for This Approach
variablesBind three core variables: concentrate composition, tank current, and test batch numberMatch the core traceability dimensions of this category, covering key data from batching, smelting, and testing links
Trigger node typeCombine event-triggered and batch-triggeredAdapt to different update frequencies of real-time electrolyzer condition data and batch-type production data
HTTP request node timeout30–60 secondsCover the average response time of cross-system data pulling, avoid single orchestration interruptions
nodeIdBind unique identifiers of smelting record nodes and test report nodesEnsure the accuracy of cross-node data association, avoid data mixing
Result display nodeOutput the top 5 abnormal recordsFocus on core abnormal data for defect analysis, avoid interference from redundant information
Custom tool call timesFirst 3 callsBalance the completeness of data pulling and orchestration execution efficiency

Three common mistakes

  • Phenomenon: The output of the HTTP request node is not displayed in the conversation result, and the status code returns 200 but the fields are empty. Cause: The target field returned by the request is not bound in the variables configuration, causing the node output to not be captured by the context.
  • Phenomenon: No data is displayed when generating a chart using axis variables in the orchestration. Cause: The variable is not bound to the corresponding data source field, and the variable value does not match the actual data field.
  • Phenomenon: The SQL generated by the text2sql link cannot be associated with the target smelting batch data. Cause: The unique identifier of the batch number node is not bound in the nodeId, causing the SQL query scope to not cover the target production batch.

How to confirm the configuration is complete

  • Trigger a test orchestration, check whether the core variables bound by variables are normally displayed in the node logs.
  • Run the HTTP request node, verify whether the returned fields match the output fields bound in the configuration.
  • Execute the text2sql link, check whether the generated SQL contains filter conditions for the target production batch.
  • View the node flow logs of the orchestration, confirm that the nodeId identifiers of all associated nodes do not have duplicates or misplacements.

The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.