What the documents look like
For product questions in General export declarations, this page examines FastGPT document chunking. A transport-disassembly note must remain associated with the illustrated machine. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the document chunking step
A proposed export product page illustrates a worktable and lists a top with legs. A continuation across the page break says the legs are removed for transport and packed separately with the goods. A question about assembled arrival needs the transport setting and included-but-separate relationship preserved. Removed does not mean omitted, while a worktable illustration does not establish an assembled delivery. Parsing should verify that the continuation still belongs to this product rather than assigning the second half to the next product merely because it starts on another page.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Original or chunk check | Specific source relationship | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Page continuation | Note still belongs to worktable | Check parsed paragraph membership. |
| Transport setting | Legs removed for transport | Do not turn into omitted component. |
| Inclusion relationship | Separately packed but included | Keep relationship with component. |
| Form distinction | Illustrated structure versus arrival form | Inspect which evidence the question returns. |
| Added-list review | Product, processing and indexes | Compare original, parsing and citations. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Original-document check | Compare original files with parsed output. |
Chunk completeness | Keep conditions traceable to their subjects. |
Data and indexes | Retain original-data and index evidence separately. |
Sample retrieval | Retest literal wording and natural questions. |
Post-update check | Inspect training or index state after updates. |
Three common errors
One common error separates packed with the goods from legs and the answer interprets removal as exclusion. Another retrieves only the illustrated structure and treats it as arrival form. Compare page continuation, parsed order and actual blocks to distinguish lost component relationships from mixed use states. Assembled and separate-part search wording should still trace to original transport conditions; the question vocabulary cannot supply them. Installation service is also absent, so the material cannot establish who assembles the table after arrival or that an assembly arrangement already exists.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should search legs, for transport and packed separately with the goods, followed by the complete arrival-form question. Citations should explain both removal and continued inclusion. The answer needs to distinguish structure, transport packaging and assembly arrangements not supplied. After obtaining a packing list, inspect applicable product, actual processing and index state before retesting. Upload success neither repairs page-break membership by itself nor proves actual received contents. Compare original, parsed output and returned blocks, preserving earlier incorrect blocks as evidence for locating the specific relationship failure.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Export Declaration Form, Commercial Invoice, Packing List and Contract |
| Candidate sources | China International Trade Single Window, Customs Code Database, Freight Forwarder Bill of Lading and Enterprise ERP |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |