What the documents look like
For product questions in General import declarations, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. The goods entry for loose connectors and the wooden-case description have different subjects. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
This proposed import product exercise pairs a commercial invoice listing loose connectors with a packing list describing wooden outer cases. Technical specification text is not supplied. Questions about complete machinery or wooden construction require separating goods from transport packaging. The case sentence supports the outer packaging, while the connector entry supports the named goods. Neither establishes a complete-machine configuration or connector composition. Citations need to identify the particular entry and its subject so that nearby documentary terms do not move attributes between objects. Loose also needs its documentary scope preserved: it describes the connectors on this line, not the assembly state of every object inside the cases. A shipment-wide question needs a complete applicable goods list. Evidence for one entry cannot determine other entries that have not been inspected.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Task check | Material condition | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Goods subject | Invoice lists loose connectors | Retain the entry identity. |
| Packaging subject | Wooden refers to outer cases | Check the sentence subject and scope. |
| Composition evidence | No connector composition specification supplied | Record the technical text still needed. |
| Line mismatch | Correct link may accompany wrong passage | Match citation entry to the question. |
| Assembly scope | Other shipment lists not inspected | Avoid deriving total shipment composition from one line. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
One common error is using the wooden-case sentence to answer a question about product composition. Another occurs when a link opens the correct document but the passage actually supplied concerns a different goods line. The first requires checking the sentence subject; the second requires matching the cited entry to the goods in question. An accessible source does not resolve a line-level mismatch, and a populated citation array does not fill the specification gap. The invoice alone also cannot rule out another assembly or additional goods in the shipment.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance checks can ask first about outer packaging and then about the evidence for connector composition. The answers should trace respectively to the packing sentence and the missing specification requirement. A complete-machine question should identify the loose connectors listed here while preserving uncertainty about other goods or an assembly list not yet inspected. Compare actual citation wording with the line identity and qualifications. When no citation appears, trace retrieval and passage transfer rather than converting that execution condition into a negative conclusion about the goods themselves.