What the documents look like
For product questions in Franchise store supervision, this page examines FastGPT document chunking. Shelf-position examples and sale-specification lists need separate source identities. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the document chunking step
A proposed convenience-store display example places a small package on an upper shelf, under a heading that says positions only. A separate reference sends saleable specifications to the current product booklet, which is absent. A question about small and large packs needs this example role preserved: an illustrated placement does not establish current saleable sizes. Parsing should retain example identity and the referenced source. Chunking must not assign the position sentence to booklet contents or treat an unseen large pack as evidence that the format is not sold.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Original or chunk check | Specific source relationship | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Example identity | Positions only | Check heading limitation survives. |
| Illustrated subject | Small package on upper shelf | Do not treat as saleable list. |
| Referenced source | Current booklet absent | Retain missing-text requirement. |
| Format question | Pack sizes and current-period scope | Check answer does not expand example. |
| Added-booklet retest | Period, processing and indexes | Compare actual new citations. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Original-document check | Compare original files with parsed output. |
Chunk completeness | Keep conditions traceable to their subjects. |
Data and indexes | Retain original-data and index evidence separately. |
Sample retrieval | Retest literal wording and natural questions. |
Post-update check | Inspect training or index state after updates. |
Three common errors
One failure separates positions only and the answer presents the small pack as confirmed on sale. Another merges the booklet reference with the example so the product list appears already supplied. Compare heading, document identity and actual block boundaries to distinguish lost limitations from source substitution. Search wording for pack specifications still needs real specification text. Without the booklet, multiple example hits do not become a saleable-item list, and more matching passages cannot replace the missing source or establish the scope of the current period.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should query upper shelf, small package, saleable specification and the complete current-formats question. Returned blocks should distinguish example from reference. The answer may explain packaging used in the position example while leaving actual current formats dependent on the booklet. After obtaining it, inspect applicable period, actual processing and index state before testing whether new citations use that source. Successful upload does not establish matched periods or removal of the earlier example as a list substitute. Preserve original-to-parsed comparisons and check continued expansion of the example scope.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Store Visit Report, Franchise Contract, Rectification Notice and Display Standards |
| Candidate sources | Supervisor APP, POS Sales, Franchise System and Store Photos |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |