What the documents look like
This category covers disposable plastic bags and single-use items reporting for supermarkets and convenience stores. The work centers on disposable plastic product reporting and environmental supervision rather than membership marketing or cashier promotions. The main data sources are the Ministry of Commerce reporting system, POS plastic bag sales, the procurement system, and store ledgers. Typical documents include plastic bag procurement ledgers, sales vouchers, semi-annual reports, and self-discipline commitments. The most time-consuming steps are counting usage volume, checking sales vouchers, and reporting recovery information. These materials sit at three distinct stages: procurement, sales, and submission. Workflow routing must let each node accept only the input that matches its stage.
For product information and selection questions, the practical consequence is that a procurement ledger, a sales voucher, and a semi-annual report are not interchangeable inputs. A procurement ledger records purchase quantity and supplier. A semi-annual report carries usage and recovery fields. A sales voucher supports sales-stage checking. Routing that treats any of these as a substitute for another will pass the wrong material downstream.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
The form input node is a user interaction node. When it triggers, the conversation enters an interaction state, the workflow state is recorded, and execution waits until the user completes the interaction. The node collects required form information and passes it to later nodes after submission. The user selection node is also a user interaction node. It triggers the same interaction state and workflow state recording, and after the user makes a choice it evaluates that choice and executes the corresponding branch. Both nodes record workflow state and wait for user completion before continuing.
Retrieval results and form values do not constitute authorization. The submission action for a procurement ledger, the checking conclusion for a sales voucher, and the submission status of a semi-annual report must each be carried by later nodes. A form collects values. Business verification, approval, database writes, and external synchronization require their stated downstream implementation. A pending request is not approval, an offered option is not execution, and an unsigned termination is not a completed termination.
Hypothetical paper test case: the procurement ledger text supplied for checking reads, "March 2025, a store procured 12,000 disposable plastic bags, supplier a packaging factory, purchase order number CG-20250310." The handoff request to be judged reads, "Write this batch of procurement data into the usage field of the semi-annual report." The request touches two different stages. The procurement ledger states purchase quantity and supplier. It does not state usage volume or recovery volume. The ledger cannot serve directly as the basis for filling the usage field of the semi-annual report.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Setting or check content | Relation to this page's documents |
|---|---|---|
| Form input node | Set required fields and collect identifiers for the procurement ledger, sales voucher, and similar materials | Collects inputs needed for product information and selection questions |
| User selection node | Set branch questions and execute the matching path after the user chooses | Separates procurement ledger checking from semi-annual report submission |
| Interaction state check | Confirm the node enters the interaction state and records workflow state after triggering | Shared behavior of the form input and user selection nodes |
| Output handoff check | Compare each node output against the input of the later retrieval, judgment, or interface node | Connection between procurement data and submission fields |
| External operation division | Order writes, document backfill, and external status synchronization connect to separate business interfaces | Procurement ledger writes and semi-annual report submission |
No default values, limits, units, menus, or global switches are assumed here. The form input node and the user selection node are documented as interaction nodes with the behavior described above. Fields, branch questions, and downstream connections are implementation checks rather than documented fixed settings.
Three common errors
- Writing the procurement quantity from the procurement ledger directly into the usage field of the semi-annual report. The ledger and the report belong to different stages. The usage field needs actual usage data, and purchase quantity does not replace it. In the hypothetical case, the ledger states 12,000 bags procured, and the request asks for a usage value that the ledger does not contain.
- Treating a branch choice in the user selection node as an authorization conclusion. The node executes the corresponding branch after the user chooses. It does not authorize procurement, submission, or signing actions. A branch labeled "check procurement ledger" routes to ledger checking and does not approve any write.
- Treating a retrieved procurement ledger entry as a basis for writing into the semi-annual report. Retrieval supplies candidate materials. The write action must be carried by a later node or business interface. A relevance score is not a category, entity, or permission filter, and retrieval is not authorization.
How to verify the setup
- Input the hypothetical ledger text and the handoff request given above, then compare the requested field against the fields stated in the ledger. The ledger states purchase quantity and supplier. It does not state usage volume. When the request asks to write the usage field, the condition is not met, and the field gap should be recorded. The expected observation is a recorded missing field rather than a completed write.
- Input the hypothetical ledger text, then compare the branch output of the user selection node against the input of the later node. When the branch is "check procurement ledger," the later node should receive the ledger identifier. When the branch is "submit semi-annual report," the later node should receive the report identifier. A mismatch between branch and received input should be recorded. The expected observation is a matching identifier for the selected branch.
- Input an empty-result handoff scenario using the explicit paper input [] and check the downstream design. When the downstream node receives an empty array, it should enter a waiting or supplement-request state and should not perform a write or submission action. This empty result does not assert that a fictional rule retrieval always returns an empty array. It only checks the downstream handoff logic. The expected observation is a waiting or supplement-request state with no write or submission.
These checks describe what to compare and what remains unknown. No test, deployment, approval, or refund is claimed to have occurred. Where evidence is absent, the gap stays recorded.