What the documents look like
For product questions in Livestream sample inspections, this page examines FastGPT model connections. Separate sample findings, credential subjects and restricted scope without inventing sale eligibility. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the model connections step
Suppose a sample sheet records tactile observations, a test report covers another specification, supplier credentials identify an entity, and the market scope of a restricted-products list needs checking. Inspect the texts and subjects actually received by the model. A tactile opinion establishes neither safety compliance nor sale eligibility. This exercise supplies no actual test metric or platform admission result. Document count and response speed do not prove a sample/report match.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Sample-selection evidence | Hypothetical scope | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation | Tactile observation | No safety-pass claim |
| Testing | Other-specification report | Match sample identity |
| Credential | Supplier entity | No product-performance proof |
| Restriction | Market scope unresolved | No all-channel expansion |
| Supplement | Same-specification report | Update supported parts only |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
AI Proxy dependency | Inspect services, channels and application for the deployed version. |
AIPROXY_API_ENDPOINT | Use the AI Proxy service root address. |
AIPROXY_API_TOKEN | Use a nonempty administrator token matching the service. |
Model capabilities | Test capabilities required by the actual input path. |
Application parameters | Same-named interface fields need not override application settings. |
Three common errors
- If a report’s specification field is omitted and the answer approves this sample, compare the report page with actual input to locate lost subject information.
- If supplier credentials prove product performance, inspect their entity-identification purpose and separate test evidence. Entity records replace no sample result.
- If the list’s market scope disappears and all channels become eligible, compare the rule scope with the proposed destination. Missing corresponding rules remain unresolved.
How to verify the setup
Hold the sample sheet and report fixed and ask which evidence supports observation, testing and sale eligibility separately. A same-specification report should update only its supported conclusion. Model or parameter comparisons need the same sources and questions, with actual input and citations retained. Test image reports separately without accuracy or certification promises. Actual selection still requires responsible review of testing, channel rules and authority; this exercise lists no product for sale.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Sample Evaluation Form, Quality Inspection Report, Supplier Qualifications and Prohibited Sales List |
| Candidate sources | Supplier Information, Testing Agency Report, Platform Negative Catalog and Historical Return Rate |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |