What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in B2B marketplaces, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Inspect the after-sales share entry, visibility of contract and settlement sources, and context actually supplied to the conversation. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A new B2B after-sales exercise uses an electronic contract stating a service commitment and a settlement statement marking the transaction complete. Trace both independently; settlement status does not establish performance of every service commitment. Verify the application opened by the complete share link, then test reading of contract and settlement resources separately. A working entry with an unreadable contract cannot validate its commitment. Inspect source scope and authorization before replacing missing contract evidence with settlement text.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Sharing or implementation check | B2B after-sales object | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Complete entry | Actual application, contract and settlement | Record visibility of each resource |
| Business meaning | Separate commitment from completed status | No inferred performance of all commitments |
| Anonymous session | Inspect original browser and new device separately | Actual question, history and citation subject |
| Entry limits | Expiry and per-user QPM | Separate evidence from service-operation state |
| Authentication and grants | An identified person does not receive all sources | Test the same original with a denied identity |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If an open entry lacks the contract but settlement completion supplies service promises, retain visible sources and answer. Inspect the contract resource; transaction status establishes no fulfilled service.
- If a new device borrows another transaction’s commitment, compare question, actual history and citation. Anonymous identity carries no automatic continuity; obtain contract and transaction identity when missing.
- If authentication becomes access to every contract, test the same original with a denied identity, recording actual reads and grants. Identifying a user does not authorize transaction resources.
How to verify the setup
Where a cross-device buyer or supplier entry requires authentication, first verify edition support, then inspect the authentication result alongside resources visible to that identity. Identifying a person does not grant every transaction contract. Test the same source with an identity intended to be denied and retain visible originals if access incorrectly remains available. An absent logistics or receipt source also remains an evidence gap; a share link cannot supply a delivery conclusion.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Business Certification Documents, Inquiry and Quotation Sheet, Electronic Contract and Platform Settlement Statement |
| Candidate sources | B2B Platform, National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, Payment Transaction Records and Logistics Tracking |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |