What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Temu semi-managed sellers, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Warehouse release, a pending location stocktake and a non-receipt report need separate evidence. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed Temu aftersales fixture contains an order entry marked released from warehouse, a storage-location check marked stocktake pending and a complaint recording a buyer report of non-receipt. These describe warehouse activity, inventory checking and the content of a complaint. They can coexist, and none supplies a receipt confirmation. A delivery question must retain each action and subject. Warehouse release cannot become signed receipt, while a pending stocktake cannot establish that the goods were never dispatched or that the complaint is substantiated. The buyer report and stocktake also concern different subjects: order receipt and a storage location. Explaining non-receipt would require investigation material connecting those subjects. A nearby pending-stocktake state cannot become the cause of a missing parcel or assign responsibility without an evidenced relationship between the records.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Task check | Material condition | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Warehouse action | Order released from warehouse | Cite the subject and action scope. |
| Stocktake state | Location stocktake pending | Do not expand into a shortage finding. |
| Report identity | Non-receipt is a buyer report | Retain the reporting source. |
| Delivery evidence | Receipt material absent from fixture | Seek transport and receipt evidence. |
| Citation qualification | Several processes concern one order | Check the dimension of each sentence. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
Two concrete failure conditions need different evidence. A delivered conclusion supported only by warehouse release requires transport and receipt material. A warehouse-shortage conclusion supported only by stocktake pending requires an actual stocktake finding. A FastGPT citation array that also contains the complaint adds a report source but does not verify the reported event. Source titles, status terms and dates must remain attached to their process dimensions, since records under one order cannot be collapsed into a single final outcome merely because they share an order subject.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should check warehouse release, inventory-check progress, the buyer report and receipt evidence separately. An answer can state that release and non-receipt reports are present while identifying the delivery proof absent from this fixture; stocktaking remains pending. Inspect actual citation wording for these qualifications instead of relying on source labels. Empty references first require investigation of retrieval scope and passage transfer. They cannot establish that the order has no fulfilment record, and they cannot decide the complaint outcome without the relevant supporting material.