What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Amazon FBA preparation, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. The current plan and pending receipt cannot acquire an earlier shipment outcome. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed FBA aftersales tracking packet contains an inbound plan marked created, a current inventory entry marked awaiting receipt and a historical receipt record for an earlier shipment. A question about the current shipment needs its own receipt evidence. Plan creation establishes an arrangement, awaiting receipt is the supplied current state and an earlier shipment outcome cannot be transferred. Citation identity matters more than a shared title, so the plan, current state and historical result must remain visibly attached to their respective shipment subjects. Earlier receipt also cannot establish that the current shipment will follow the same handling course or outcome. It remains historical information. Reporting current progress needs records identified with the current shipment and their actual stage, without using an earlier successful receipt to fill the present evidence gap.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Task check | Material condition | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Plan state | Current plan created | Limit the claim to an arrangement. |
| Current entry | Current shipment awaiting receipt | Retain current-shipment identity. |
| Historical result | Earlier shipment received | Do not transfer to current shipment. |
| Completion evidence | Current receipt proof not supplied | Seek outcome material for this shipment. |
| Qualification retention | Passage may omit shipment identity | Compare supplied wording with original. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
One common error is citing the earlier receipt while omitting its shipment identity from an answer that says received. Another risk is supplying only the plan-created sentence and allowing the answer to add an actual arrival event. Check shipment correspondence in the first case and actual receipt evidence in the second. FastGPT can expose the cited content, but the existence of a source does not establish applicability to this shipment. Awaiting receipt also cannot prove that goods were never dispatched, since transport and warehouse receipt are separate checks.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance questions should distinguish plan creation, the wording of the current inventory entry and actual receipt evidence for this shipment. Cite the first two states directly and identify the shipment-specific receipt record still needed for the third. Keep the historical result attributed to its earlier shipment. Compare each answer sentence with citation identity and inspect whether passage transfer dropped the shipment qualification. Empty references call for checking search scope and transfer; they cannot establish that a plan is absent or that the current shipment definitely has not arrived.