What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Franchise store supervision, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. A store notice and inspection standard must correspond to the current matter. External records still need separate evidence for sending, reception and later verification before the service question can be answered. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A franchise-store service inquiry can ask what a notice, standard and current feedback each support. Proposed material contains visit findings and a notice without this store’s receipt or follow-up evidence. Sending does not establish resolution. Before an HTTP reading, inspect whether the real contract supports this store, matter and version, then select address, method and references. No available supervision endpoint or complete handling coverage is assumed.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Service-reading check | Proposed material | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Store subject | Visit and notice identities | Response is not another store |
| Notice stage | Sent without reception source | Not rewritten as received |
| Version applicability | Standard passage and inspection scope | Sent conditions match this instance |
| Evidence retest | Corresponding receipt or follow-up | Explanation actually uses the addition |
| Business result | Separate closure or rectification write | Query is not an acceptance record |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Wrong store response: A response for another store needs request-subject and source-identity checks before removal. Sent notice mistaken for reception: A sent notice described as received needs this store’s actual reception evidence. Inapplicable standard version: A standard version outside this inspection’s scope needs applicability and transmitted-condition checks before another reading. These concern subject, stage and version; a response alone establishes none of those relationships.
How to verify the setup
Retain store, matter, standard scope, actual request and return. Repeat after corresponding receipt or follow-up material arrives and inspect use of the addition. Check parameters, headers and any appropriate body separately under the real contract, keeping authentication private. Rectification writes, closure or external submissions need separate permission and receipts. Reading completion establishes neither accepted notice, corrected conditions nor approved responsibility judgments.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Store Visit Report, Franchise Contract, Rectification Notice and Display Standards |
| Candidate sources | Supervisor APP, POS Sales, Franchise System and Store Photos |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |