What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Franchise store supervision, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Inspect other-store boundaries in a shared correction note, separating supplied photos, comments and actual recheck results. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed service entry gives an owner their store’s correction summary. Ordinary text says a storefront-sign photo was added while dimensions remain unverified; other contracts and internal reviews are excluded. Inspect the receiving environment and restricted sources through the complete link, retaining originals and full responses. Added photos establish neither read dimensions nor accepted correction. A received link also verifies no owner identity. Test scope directly instead of deriving sharing from a regional category.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Store-share check | Correction-summary scope | Acceptance action |
|---|---|---|
| Store note | Photo added; dimensions unverified | Original in receiving environment |
| Restricted sources | Exclude other contracts and internal reviews | Full responses and denials |
| Device history | Store and prior question behind this item | Provide missing material |
| Confirmation stage | Added photo is not accepted correction | Standards and review source |
| Business handling | Answer approves or records nothing | Actual outcomes and identity conditions |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If this entry repeats another contract or internal review, retain store identity and full response. Shared regional service authorizes no cross-store reading.
- If phone acceptance follow-up lacks store and earlier photo question, inspect history and obtain the source. Anonymous identity cannot automatically borrow another store’s result.
- If an added photo becomes conforming dimensions or accepted correction, inspect standards and review records. Obtaining material supplies no confirmation, and answers execute no visit or approval.
How to verify the setup
Test this summary, another store’s contract and internal opinions for reads and denials, retaining originals and version-specific entry conditions. Separate an obtained review omitted from input from one not yet available; longer validity supplies neither. Required identity validation needs commercial capability and return checks. Explanation can list actions and standards to obtain without approving corrections, amending contracts or writing visit records. Actual review outcomes need responsible and system evidence rather than an ended conversation.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Store Visit Report, Franchise Contract, Rectification Notice and Display Standards |
| Candidate sources | Supervisor APP, POS Sales, Franchise System and Store Photos |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |