What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Convenience fresh-food orders, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Batch identity, explanations of handling and arrival timing require different sources. This reading keeps order passages, spoilage wording and device evidence within the questions each can actually support. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A fresh-food inquiry can inspect ordering, spoilage and handling passages without identifying quality from fragments. Proposed material supplies batch order and spoilage wording, not temperature or actual receipt evidence. An external HTTP contract must define retrievable subjects and times; device connectivity is not presumed. A record supports its own statements rather than supplying storage conditions, causes or handling conclusions from a product name or spoilage occurrence.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Service-reading check | Proposed material | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Batch mapping | Batch named in order and spoilage | Response has not switched batches |
| Causal scope | Expiry handling separate from temperature | Action is not automatically a cause |
| Time meaning | Present stock versus earlier arrival | Request covers the asked moment |
| Source addition | Corresponding receipt or device passage | Retest uses actual added evidence |
| Handling state | Separate order change or spoilage operation | Reading is not a quality finding |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Wrong returned batch: A response for another batch needs batch and request-origin checks. Handling mistaken for temperature cause: Expiry handling treated as a temperature cause needs inspection of the recorded action and actual device evidence. Present stock used for earlier arrival: Present stock used to explain earlier arrival requires separate time-meaning and coverage checks. These concern subject, cause and timing; an empty result also does not establish non-arrival or absent handling.
How to verify the setup
Retain the batch question, source status, actual request and return scope. Repeat after corresponding receipt or device material arrives, limiting the answer to obtained evidence. Check headers, parameters and any appropriate body under the real contract with protected authentication. Order changes, spoilage entries and handling decisions need separate permission and receipts. Reading establishes neither identified quality, responsibility nor completed treatment.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Fresh Food Order Form, Spoilage Report, Near-Expiry Processing Sheet and Temperature Records |
| Candidate sources | POS Sales, Headquarters Ordering System, Store Inventory and Cold Chain Temperature Control Records |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |