What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Letter-of-credit documents, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Limit shared presentation progress by case and source stage without deriving bank acceptance or fund handling from a link. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed collaboration entry reports obtained supplementary passages and outstanding bank replies for one case, excluding internal comments and other cases. Read through the complete link in the receiving environment, then request restricted sources. Entry credentials and actual trading identity establish different things; required identity checks depend on verified commercial capability. Link validity concerns the entry. Dates and amendments in a credit still require obtained originals and their relationship to this case.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Presentation-progress share | Public and restricted sources | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Public summary | Separate obtained and outstanding | Passage received through link |
| Restricted cases | Exclude internal comments and other cases | Full answers and denial |
| Device follow-up | Case and prior acceptance question | Actual history and supplementation |
| Different dates | Entry validity versus document dates | Originals and amendment relationship |
| Actual outcome | Supplements imply no acceptance or payment | Handling and financial evidence |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If a progress summary returns another case’s credit or internal bank comments, retain case passages and full answers. Removing customer names replaces no restriction.
- If a phone asks about bank acceptance without the computer’s case and question, inspect history and obtain them. Anonymous identity cannot automatically borrow the latest case.
- If a supplementary record or valid link becomes bank acceptance or completed funds, obtain the case’s processing reply and financial evidence separately. Entry state supplies no business receipt.
How to verify the setup
Test public progress, internal comments and unrelated cases for reads and denials, retaining passages, identity conditions and versions. Separate an obtained supplement omitted from this input from an unobtained bank reply; extending validity supplies neither source. Repeat object-free follow-ups on another device and inspect the request for missing evidence. Sharing explains progress without sending documents, accepting discrepancies or handling funds. Actual submission and outcomes need separate system and owner records rather than a visible conversation.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Letter of Credit, Commercial Invoice, Bill of Lading, Insurance Policy and Bill of Exchange |
| Candidate sources | Issuing Bank Notice, UCP600 Clauses, Freight Forwarder Bill of Lading and Bank Document Submission Records |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |