What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Franchisee onboarding, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Attendance, assessed performance and site verification need different evidence. The query must retrieve sources for the stage being asked about while keeping the store and applicable handbook version in view. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
An onboarding inquiry should identify whether it concerns attendance, assessment or site preparation. Proposed material contains attendance, handbook wording and pending opening checks, not actual assessment or verification. Before reading external training sources, inspect the real contract’s store, learner and version support instead of assuming access from document titles. A handbook supports reading, not passed training or approved opening.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Service-reading check | Proposed material | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Store identity | This training and opening inquiry | Other-store results not used |
| Attendance and ability | Attendance without actual assessment | No passing conclusion |
| Checklist status | Pending items without verification | Not rewritten as completed site checks |
| Request scope | Learner, version and questioned stage | Actual conditions match the return |
| Formal decision | Separate recognition, opening or writing | Reading is not headquarters approval |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Wrong store returned: A response for another store requires request-party and source checks. Attendance mistaken for assessed ability: Attendance described as competence requires this learner’s actual assessment. Pending checks mistaken for site completion: Pending checklist items described as completed require this store’s verification records. These concern subject, performance and site execution; a successful interface supplies none of those outcomes. Source update time is also not automatically formal approval time.
How to verify the setup
Retain store, questioned stage, applicable SOP, sent conditions and return coverage. Repeat after corresponding assessment or site sources arrive and inspect use of the addition. Check parameters separately from headers and structure a body where appropriate under the contract without public credentials. Recognition, opening approval and profile writes need separate authority and receipts. Reading establishes neither a headquarters decision nor nonattendance from missing evidence.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Training Attendance Sheet, Opening Checklist, SOP Manual and Assessment Scores |
| Candidate sources | Training System, Supervisor APP, Store Photos and Headquarters SOP Library |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |