What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Marketplace advertising, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Separate attribution events from order-service evidence in a shared explanation, testing boundaries across campaign sources. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed service entry lets a brand read attribution notes for one campaign, excluding another campaign’s audience appendix. Inspect permitted and restricted questions through the complete link, retaining originals and full responses. Paraphrased segmentation from another plan requires grant investigation even when its title is undisplayed. Attribution notes explain conversion fields without supplying repair, refund or performance facts. A complete answer does not enlarge the source’s support scope.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Share check | Attribution-reading scope | Acceptance clue |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign boundary | Separate plan notes and another audience appendix | Full response including segmentation paraphrases |
| Field meaning | Conversion supplies no order-service event | No rewritten service completion |
| Anonymous subject | Plan, period and order across devices | Provide prior question and inspect history |
| Source gap | Separate absent service record and failed continuity | Record material to obtain |
| Business action | Explanation issues no refund or attribution change | Inspect entry limits and actual system outcomes |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If one campaign entry paraphrases another audience segmentation, retain source and full response to inspect grants. Missing titles or report displays do not establish isolation.
- If phone follow-up lacks the computer’s campaign period and order, inspect history and prior question. Anonymous identity does not inherit the subject from another plan.
- If conversion becomes completed repair, refund or performance, compare attribution fields with required order events. Retain missing service evidence; the response executes neither refunds nor attribution edits.
How to verify the setup
Test the intended plan, another plan and a service question lacking its source, recording permitted reads, denials and unresolved material. Inspect expiry and per-user limits by version. Identifying a brand recipient requires separate commercial-edition identity-capability checks; a link identifies no business party. Answers may list order records to obtain, but execute no refund or attribution change and establish no advertising effect on service. Handling, causal judgments and business status need complete-source review.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Advertising Plan, Keyword Report, Audience Package Description and Conversion Attribution Table |
| Candidate sources | Juliang Qianchuan, JD Kuaiche advertising, Alimama and Store Transaction Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |