What the documents look like
Category access is decided before listing or merchant onboarding. The core materials are the business license, trademark registration certificate, brand authorization chain and industry license. In order fulfillment and after-sales question answering, these materials enter a share link as files for review by merchant recruitment operations, store onboarding specialists or brand channel managers. Qualification status changes with each onboarding attempt and updates are irregular.
The share link itself only produces an accessible address. Its link identifier does not function as a business authorization. The login-free window generates a localId to identify a user and pulls conversation records from the cloud, but this only holds on the same device and same browser. Switching devices or clearing browser cache loses those records, and the system permits pulling only the last 30 days and 20 records.
Three facts shape this task. First, a share link can be opened before any category approval exists, so accessibility says nothing about qualification status. Second, identity verification returns a uid used for pulling and saving conversation records, which is a record-keeping credential rather than a qualification decision. Third, retrieval relevance scores describe similarity only and do not isolate unrelated businesses or unauthorized records. Retrieval is not authorization.
Constraints at the shared access step
Identity verification is a commercial-edition feature. After a verification root address is configured, share link initialization, conversation start and conversation end each send a POST request to that address. The unified response must return success and uid. The uid must be a string containing no "|", "/" or "\" characters and no more than 255 bytes in length; otherwise an Invalid UID error is returned. Conversation records are pulled and saved by uid, so cross-device scenarios need separate identity and session design.
Partial parameters such as expiration time, QPM and points cap are configurable only in the commercial edition, subject to the actual version. A relevance score reflects similarity. It does not act as a permission or entity filter, and retrieval does not constitute authorization.
Hypothetical paper exercise. An onboarding specialist holds three source sentences. "The business license subject is Company A; the unified social credit code is omitted; the business scope includes food sales." "The trademark registration certificate registrant is Company A; validity runs to a stated date." "The brand authorization chain shows Company B authorizing Company A to use the trademark; the authorization letter does not state an authorization term." The draft sentence under review reads: "Company A has complete qualifications, can complete category access and open a share link." This draft treats the existence of materials as completed access and does not check the authorization term or platform review status.
Configuration and implementation checks
The table below concerns this page's sample. Values are starting points for this hypothetical exercise, not official defaults.
| Configuration item | Hypothetical starting point or check action | Comparison object and reason |
|---|---|---|
| Identity verification root address | Enter the third-party system root address, not a full path | Compare whether requests go to /shareAuth/init, /start, /finish |
| authToken | Append the authToken parameter to the share link | Compare whether token in the verification body equals this value |
| Expiration time | Set according to this onboarding cycle | Compare link usable deadline against material validity period |
| QPM | Set as maximum visits per user per minute | Compare actual request frequency against the set value |
| Points cap | Set according to this share's usage | Compare accumulated consumption against the set cap |
| Conversation record boundary | Check the same-device same-browser condition | Compare whether cross-device scenarios have separate design |
Three common errors
- Treating the share link identifier as a business authorization. An accessible link only means the address is valid; it does not mean category access has been approved. In the sample, the draft sentence "can complete category access" lacks platform review status evidence.
- Treating a success return from identity verification as qualification approval. success only means identity verification passed, and uid is used only to pull and save conversation records. It does not verify the business license, trademark or authorization chain.
- Treating a retrieval relevance score as a permission filter. The score reflects similarity only and does not exclude unrelated businesses or unauthorized records. In the sample, the authorization letter states no term, and retrieving that file does not mean the authorization is valid.
How to verify the setup
- Input the sample source sentences and the draft sentence. Compare whether the draft asserts a completed access status that the materials do not state. If the draft contains "can complete category access" while the materials hold only a business license, a trademark certificate and an authorization letter with no stated term, the claim is unsupported and platform review status evidence is still required.
- Input the share link and authToken. Compare the success and uid returned by the verification interface. If success is true and uid meets the length and character requirements, identity verification passes. If success is not true, the error in message is displayed and subsequent conversation does not proceed.
- Input a cross-device access request. Compare the conditions under which localId pulls records. If the same uid cannot pull the last 30 days and 20 records on a different device or after cache clearing, the records are lost and separate identity and session design is needed. For the retrieval check, if an empty result is returned, use the paper input [] to check the downstream design; do not claim that a fictional rule search necessarily returns empty.