What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Store cold-chain receiving, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Use a specified arrival batch to test permitted and denied service-sharing scope, preserving actual evidence for temperature and rejection reasons. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed service entry shares this batch’s rejection note with its supplier, excluding inspection photos for other suppliers on the same vehicle. Obtain the complete channel address, ask about the intended reason and then another batch, retaining visible originals. Paraphrased descriptions of restricted photos require grant investigation even when no attachment is displayed. Vehicle classification helps navigation without authorizing cross-supplier sharing, and a valid link gives no universal business permission.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Service-sharing check | Arrival and rejection scope | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Current note | Share only the relevant supplier’s reason | Original in the receiving environment |
| Same-vehicle restriction | Other suppliers’ photos excluded | Full response including paraphrases |
| Across devices | Inspect computer and phone history separately | Provide batch and original record |
| Conditional support | Temperature needs timing and acceptance conditions | No receipt conclusion from history alone |
| Actual handling | Separate reason, agreement and compensation | Inspect site and business records |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If one supplier reads another inspection-photo description, retain the response and inspect cross-supplier scope. Vehicle classification and valid links do not replace grants.
- If a phone lacks the receiving computer’s batch reference, inspect history and obtain the current record. Anonymous identity cannot automatically borrow an earlier vehicle’s source.
- If rejection reasons become agreement, liability or completed compensation, inspect handling sources and site conditions. Recorded reasons establish no consent; text answers perform no inspection or compensation.
How to verify the setup
Test permitted and denied reads for the intended supplier, an unrelated supplier and the store environment. Inspect expiry and per-user limits by version, with separate identity-capability checks where needed. Replies organize recorded rejection reasons without establishing supplier agreement, liability or executed compensation. Site results, dispute handling and operational status require their own sources. Text conversation replaces neither photo reading nor store inspection, and working access does not establish completed service.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Cold Chain Temperature Records, Arrival Acceptance Slip, Rejection Slip and Supplier Delivery Note |
| Candidate sources | Cold Chain Vehicle Temperature Control, WMS, Store Receiving System and Quality Inspection Photos |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |