What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Dealer rebate calculation, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Rebate-dispute service reads check transactions, channels and current confirmation. Readable policy wording cannot become a processing outcome. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A proposed dealer asks why one rebate transaction remains unresolved, but prior output contains only a channel description and policy title. Establish how an actual service can read that transaction without inventing an accounting endpoint or automatic authority. Policy supports applicability discussion, not current confirmation. If responses contain achievement material or unsigned reconciliation, preserve those stages rather than infer a deduction or payment from a credit-document name.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Rebate-dispute reading | Proposed lookup material | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction identity | Channel and title only | Actual transaction relationship |
| Policy wording | Not execution receipt | Not completed handling |
| Unsigned reconciliation | Mutual confirmation absent | Explicit current-period reply |
| System variables | Inspect test conditions | Not real-business failure |
| Formal accounting | Calculation and writes separate | Reading is not promised payment |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Channel substituted for transaction needs true correspondence beside request scope. Policy promoted to execution needs that transaction’s actual receipt. Unsigned wording promoted to mutual confirmation needs explicit current-period replies. These inspect lookup identity, action and parties’ positions independently of statement visibility.
How to verify the setup
Retain source passages, actual transmitted input and response. Add transaction correspondence and change only evidenced entries. Amounts, rates and calculations remain outside the example, with credentials private. Calculation, deductions and accounting writes need separate authority and receipts. Missing conversation-system variables in tests require test-condition checks, not a conclusion that real transactions failed. Successful reading also does not establish a payment promise.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Rebate Policy, Sales Achievement Sheet, Reconciliation Statement and Red-Letter Invoice |
| Candidate sources | ERP Sales, Dealer Payments, Contract Ledger and Financial System |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |