What the documents look like
Franchise fee and deposit settlement deals with money movement and breach deductions. It does not handle government filing. The working materials are franchise fee invoices, deposit ledgers, deduction notices, and contract payment schedules. Data comes from finance systems, franchise contracts, bank statements, and store violation records. The brief states a monthly update cycle and an update on each deduction; this page does not derive batch synchronization, real-time processing, or transaction-triggered mechanisms from that statement.
When these materials feed copy drafting, each proposed sentence must stay on the same party, the same period, and the same field as the contract payment schedule, the deduction notice, and the deposit ledger. A sentence that states an arrival status, a refund amount, or a deduction reason has to trace back to a specific record. Material that shows an amount due does not show whether payment arrived. Material that shows a deduction does not show the residual deposit refund.
Constraints at the multi-turn prompts step
Multi-turn drafting carries the prompt, the history, and the model settings into one answer. The prompt has to name the material scope, the drafting task, and the handling when evidence is missing. History is checked against the context actually carried in, and a new session is distinguished from a continued session. Question optimization is checked only for knowledge-base continuous conversation, where pronoun resolution and question expansion apply; short questions are not assumed to need it. Model and length are checked against the context and reply settings the model supports. Reply format follows the downstream consumer; when json_schema is chosen, the format requirement has to be filled in and the returned structure verified. A similarity score does not carry permission or entity isolation duties.
Hypothetical paper exercise sample. The material text reads: "Party A shall pay the franchise fee of RMB 80,000 within ten days of signing; the deposit is RMB 30,000 and is refunded at contract expiry when no deduction remains unsettled. The March 2026 deduction notice states: due to a store violation, RMB 5,000 is deducted from the deposit." The sentence to be judged reads: "The franchise fee of RMB 80,000 has arrived, and the deposit of RMB 30,000 will be refunded in full at contract expiry." The check points are these: the material states an amount due and a deduction reason, states no arrival status, and states no residual deposit refund after the deduction. The sentence's claims about arrival and full refund are therefore unsupported by the material.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Value or check for this page | Relation to the sample |
|---|---|---|
| AI model | Choose a model whose maximum context fits the contract and ledger text; check maximum context and multimodal capability | The sample material is short, and the model still has to hold both documents |
| Memory turns | Hypothetical trial starting value: keep a small number of history turns, because this task compares against earlier material; comparison object is the default value | Used to check whether the draft sentence cites the deduction notice given in an earlier turn |
| Temperature | Hypothetical trial starting value: low, because this task is a rule-clear scenario; comparison object is the default value | Reduces the tendency to add arrival or refund facts that the material does not state |
| Reply limit | Set against the model reply length so the draft sentence is not truncated | The sample sentence is short; check that it is output complete |
| Reply format | Plain text is sufficient; when a downstream step needs a fixed structure, choose json_schema and fill in the format requirement | The sample is checked as plain text |
| Stop sequence | Not set for ordinary conversation | The sample does not end on a fixed marker |
Three common errors
- Writing an arrival status the material does not state. Check: input the sample material text and the draft sentence, compare whether the sentence contains an arrival statement absent from the material; if it does, the result is unsupported.
- Writing the deposit refund after deduction as a full refund. Check: input the deduction notice and the ledger, compare whether the refund amount subtracts the stated deduction; if it does not, the result is inconsistent with the material.
- Treating a similarity score as a permission or entity filter. Check: input a retrieval result carrying a similarity score, compare whether it is used to exclude unrelated parties; if it is, the usage is incorrect.
How to verify the setup
- Input the sample material text and the draft sentence; compare whether the sentence contains an arrival statement the material does not state; the condition is met when the output is "unsupported."
- Input the deduction notice and the deposit refund sentence; compare whether the refund amount subtracts the stated deduction; the condition is met when the output is "inconsistent."
- Input a retrieval result carrying a similarity score; compare whether it is used as a permission or entity filter; the condition is met when the output is "not used as a filter." All three are paper checks and were not executed; fields the material does not state remain unknown.