What the documents look like
Peak-sale fulfillment scheduling centers on short-term peak capacity and the arrangement of people, vehicles and space, which distinguishes it from continuous balancing across multiple warehouses. The documents handled at this task step are the peak-sale forecast table, staff scheduling, the courier support plan and the exception daily report. The supplied brief gives the update frequency of this material as per event and per day; the forecast table and scheduling sheet are adjusted daily during the peak period, while the courier support plan and exception daily report are archived per event. This page addresses one task only: drafting product and marketing copy, with the interactive forms step as the mechanism. The drafting step extracts verifiable source sentences from those documents, then judges whether a proposed sentence is supported by the material. The form input node collects information the user fills in and passes it to later nodes after submission; the node does not carry a business database function, and field validation, business approval, write-back and batch operations are implemented in external systems or later nodes as required.
Constraints at the interactive forms step
When the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state, the workflow state is recorded, and execution continues after the user completes the interaction. The user selection node is also a user interaction node, and it executes the corresponding branch according to the user's choice. Neither node acts as a staff directory or a business data selector. A relevance score is not a category, entity or permission filter, and retrieval is not authorization. The interactive state is a documented node behavior, not an approval, write-back or external synchronization.
Hypothetical paper exercise sample, clearly labelled as invented for this page: a peak-sale fulfillment scheduling project has a forecast table whose source text contains three sentences. First: "The forecast peak order volume for this peak sale is 80,000 orders per day, covering the East China warehouse and the South China warehouse, for the period 1 November to 3 November." Second: "Temporary staff scheduling for the East China warehouse from 1 November to 3 November is 120 people per day, split into morning and evening shifts." Third: "The courier support plan specifies no fewer than 15 pickup vehicles per day for the East China warehouse from 1 November to 3 November." The proposed draft sentence to be judged is: "During this peak sale, the East China warehouse reaches an average daily order volume of 80,000 orders, courier pickup vehicles are no fewer than 15 per day, and the scheduling arrangements have all been implemented."
The phrase "average daily order volume of 80,000 orders" converts the forecast peak order volume into an average daily order volume. These are different value definitions of the same field, so the comparison yields a contradiction. The phrase "the scheduling arrangements have all been implemented" is not stated in the source text, so it is unsupported. The phrase "courier pickup vehicles are no fewer than 15 per day" matches the source wording "no fewer than 15," but the source limits the scope to the East China warehouse and the proposed sentence omits that scope, so the subject scope must be checked against the source before any judgment of consistency.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Use on this page | Basis or check method |
|---|---|---|
| Form input node | Collect the proposed draft sentence, the source material text and the judgment conclusion | Official documentation states the node collects filled information and passes it to later nodes |
| Required information check | Check whether source material text, proposed sentence and judgment conclusion are all present | Test the missing-item case and the completed case separately |
| User selection node | Execute the "supported" or "unsupported" branch according to the judgment conclusion | Official documentation states the node executes a branch according to the user's choice |
| Interactive state | Record the workflow state and wait for the interaction to complete after the node is triggered | Official documentation states execution continues after the interaction completes |
| Downstream division of work | Field validation, business approval and write-back are implemented in external systems as required | Official documentation states the node does not carry a business database function |
| Hypothetical trial starting point | Compare source text and proposed sentence sentence by sentence, marking consistent, contradictory and unsupported | Starting point chosen for this hypothetical exercise because it covers all three judgment results |
The hypothetical trial starting point is not an official default. It was chosen for this exercise because the three source sentences and the one proposed sentence together produce a contradiction, an unsupported item and a scope gap, which allows each check below to observe a distinct result. The comparison method is sentence-by-sentence alignment of the proposed sentence against the source sentences, field by field.
Three common errors
- Rewriting the forecast peak order volume as an average daily order volume. Input: the forecast table source text "forecast peak order volume is 80,000 orders per day" and the proposed sentence "average daily order volume reaches 80,000 orders." Compare whether the two belong to the same value definition of the same field. The definitions differ, so the result is a contradiction.
- Writing a business action that is not stated into the proposed sentence. Input: the three source sentences and the proposed sentence "the scheduling arrangements have all been implemented." Compare whether the source text states the implementation status of scheduling. The source text does not state that status, so the result is unsupported.
- Omitting a limiting scope and still judging the sentence consistent. Input: the courier support plan source text "no fewer than 15 pickup vehicles per day for the East China warehouse" and the proposed sentence "courier pickup vehicles are no fewer than 15 per day." Compare whether the subject scope in the two is the same. The proposed sentence lacks the East China warehouse limitation, so the scope difference must be recorded and consistency cannot be judged directly.
How to verify the setup
- Input the forecast table source text and the proposed sentence "average daily order volume reaches 80,000 orders" from the hypothetical exercise sample. Compare whether the two belong to the same value definition of the same field. The expected observation is a mark of contradiction, because the forecast peak order volume and the average daily order volume are different definitions. This is an expected result, not a claim that a test was run.
- Input the three source sentences and the proposed sentence "the scheduling arrangements have all been implemented" from the hypothetical exercise sample. Compare whether the source text states the implementation status of scheduling. The expected observation is a mark of unsupported, because the source text does not state that status.
- Input the courier support plan source text and the proposed sentence "courier pickup vehicles are no fewer than 15 per day" from the hypothetical exercise sample. Compare whether the subject scope in the two is the same. The expected observation is a recorded scope difference, because the proposed sentence lacks the East China warehouse limitation and consistency cannot be judged directly.
A missing item remains missing. A pending request is not an approval, an offered option is not execution, and an unsigned termination is not a completed termination. Where the supplied documents do not state a field, the field is unknown, and no deterministic failure cause or result is asserted.