What the documents look like
Overseas stock replenishment for cross-border sellers serves several sales channels at once. Inventory allocation stays with the seller, so the same stock position can be committed differently per channel. The working documents are the replenishment plan, the warehouse inbound appointment, the inventory aging table and the last-mile delivery note. Source systems named in the brief are the overseas warehouse WMS, ERP sales forecast, freight forwarder system and carrier bills. Update frequency is weekly or daily.
For copy drafting, the task depends on the subject, object, state and effective scope recorded in those documents. The interactive form step collects what a person types and passes it to later nodes. It does not act as a business database, and it does not verify that a submitted value matches warehouse or carrier records.
Constraints at the interactive forms step
When the form input node triggers, the conversation enters an interactive state, the workflow state is recorded, and execution continues after the user completes the interaction. Once the user fills the required information and submits, the node collects the submitted form values and passes them to later nodes. The user selection node also triggers an interactive state, records workflow state, and continues after the user completes the interaction; when the user makes a choice, the node evaluates that choice and executes the "yes" branch.
Field validation, business approval, write-back and batch operations need implementation in an external system or in later nodes. The interactive nodes supply the collection and branching step only. Whether a promotional sentence in a draft is supported by the material is judged by comparing the same subject, the same period and the same field.
Hypothetical paper exercise sample. Material text: "Overseas warehouse A received replenishment batch B, 120 units, on 1 March 2025; the aging table state for this batch is in stock and sellable." Draft sentence under review: "This batch has fully completed last-mile delivery." Point to decide: whether the draft sentence matches the material text on subject, object and state. The material text does not record completion of last-mile delivery, so the draft sentence is unsupported. This exercise is written for review on paper and no test has been run.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Use on this page | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| Form input node | Collect batch, subject, period and state fields for the draft | After submission, check whether the field values reach later nodes |
| Required-information review | Confirm subject, object, state and effective scope are present | Record the gap when a field is missing, then retry after it is supplied |
| User selection node | Branch on the judgment of the draft sentence | Check whether the choice result enters the matching branch |
| Interactive state | Record state and wait after the node triggers | Observe whether execution continues after the interaction completes |
| Downstream division of work | Approval, write-back and batch operations | Confirm these are implemented in an external system or later nodes |
Three common errors
- Writing a last-mile delivery state as completed when the material text does not record it. Input: the material text and the draft sentence. Comparison: subject, object and state fields. Observable result: an unsupported judgment appears for the draft sentence.
- Treating the user selection node as a business data selector. Input: the choice options and the branch configuration. Comparison: the choice result against the branch taken. Observable result: only the "yes" branch executes.
- Treating a similarity score as a permission or entity filter. Input: the retrieval condition and the returned records. Comparison: the record subject against the authorized scope. Observable result: records for unrelated subjects can still be returned.
How to verify the setup
- Input the hypothetical material text and the draft sentence given above. Compare subject, object and state. The condition is met when the unsupported judgment appears. No run has been performed.
- Input an empty-result paper list
[]. Compare whether the downstream design handles an empty value. The condition is met when explicit empty-value handling is present. - Input a cross-model library identifier. Compare the vector model identifier and exclude the non-matching library, then record the actual observation. The condition is met when the identifier check and exclusion are recorded.