What the documents look like
Creator-hosted sales campaigns turn on external creator performance and commission settlement, so the working materials differ from brand self-broadcast scheduling. Copy drafting for products and marketing depends on four document types: the creator cooperation agreement, the commission setting sheet, the sample dispatch sheet, and the live session report. These carry the cooperating parties, the commission basis, the sample status, and the session result. Any statement about price, gift, mechanism, or timing in drafted copy needs to map to one of these fields. A promotional point that no material records stays unsupported, and the model does not supply it.
The per-session and weekly update rhythm means the same product can carry different mechanics in different sessions. Drafting starts by confirming which version the copy relies on.
Constraints at the multi-turn prompts step
Multi-turn drafting needs the prompt to state the material scope, the answering task, and how missing evidence is handled. Chat history determines what context actually enters the request, and a new session differs from a continued session in its input. Question optimization handles reference resolution and question expansion in continuous knowledge-base dialogue, and short questions do not automatically qualify. Model choice and length settings set the usable context and the reply ceiling, so long documents combined with follow-up questions need separate checking. Reply format follows the downstream consumer; selecting json_schema requires filling in the corresponding format requirements and checking the returned structure. Retrieval and relevance scores do not perform permission or entity isolation, and a retrieval result does not constitute authorization.
Hypothetical drill sample: the material text reads, "Party A commissions Party B to promote product A, a vacuum flask, in a session on 18 June 2025; the session mechanism is a final price of 89 yuan with one cup brush as a gift; the sample was dispatched on 10 June 2025 and Party B has not yet confirmed receipt." The draft sentence under review is, "This session's final price is 89 yuan; order now and receive a cup brush; in-stock and ships immediately."
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Use on this page | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| AI model | Draft copy and judge the supported range against the materials | Check whether the model's maximum context and multimodal capability cover the input materials |
| Memory rounds | Retain prior materials and confirmed wording | Compare the history rounds actually carried in against the rounds this sample needs |
| Reply ceiling | Control the length of a single copy output | Compare whether the output is truncated early |
| Temperature | Affect how stable the copy wording stays | This hypothetical trial starting point takes a lower value because the copy must track the materials; compare against the default value to observe wording variation |
| Reply format | Supply structured results to a downstream node | When json_schema is selected, fill in the corresponding format requirements and check the returned structure |
| Thinking configuration | Control model thinking intensity | Select by the levels the model supports; the thinking budget and the cited token ceiling are separate settings |
Three common errors
- Writing "in-stock and ships immediately," which the materials do not record, into the draft sentence. The input is the material text above and the draft sentence; compare the shipping-timing statement in the draft against the material content. The materials do not record shipping timing, so the statement is unsupported.
- Treating sample dispatch as confirmed receipt by Party B. The input is the material wording "dispatched and not yet confirmed receipt"; compare "dispatched" against "receipt confirmed" as two distinct facts. Dispatch does not equal completed receipt.
- Treating a retrieval result as the authorization basis for external publication. The input is the citation list returned by retrieval; compare the cited content against the authorization scope in the cooperation agreement. Retrieval does not constitute authorization, and external publication still needs business-side confirmation.
How to verify the setup
- Input the material text above and the draft sentence; compare the price and gift in the draft against the corresponding material fields. The condition is met when the three agree; it is not met when an unsupported statement such as "in-stock and ships immediately" appears.
- Input "the sample was dispatched on 10 June 2025 and Party B has not yet confirmed receipt"; compare whether the answer presents dispatch as completed receipt. The condition is met when the answer keeps "not yet confirmed receipt."
- Input an explicit paper empty result []; check the downstream design for handling empty citations. The condition is met when the downstream treats it as missing evidence and states the gap. This does not support inferring that a search of a fictional rule necessarily returns an empty result.