What the documents look like
For document comparison in TikTok Shop US operations, this page examines FastGPT context limits. Image use during cooperation and replacement of withdrawn material need separate reading. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the context limits step
A proposed TikTok Shop agreement permits product images only during cooperation and requires replacement of withdrawn material. A cleanup sheet marks an old image awaiting replacement, while earlier conversation used long-term retention wording. A current question about continuing to use the old image needs cooperation period, withdrawal and pending replacement together in input. The cleanup sheet does not establish whether cooperation remains active or the image still applies. Historical wording cannot replace the current qualification, and pending replacement cannot become a completed image change.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Context review subject | Specific text condition | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Period condition | During cooperation only | Check the qualification survives input transfer. |
| Cleanup state | Old image awaiting replacement | Do not summarize as replaced. |
| Historical wording | Long-term retention lacks matching confirmation | Check the same material and period. |
| Context gap | Current cooperation state unresolved | Identify the material still needed. |
| Process handoff | Image identity, condition and cleanup progress | Check field correspondence and parsing. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Model context | Use the actual model’s accepted context scope. |
Reply length | The reply limit differs from the context window. |
Knowledge-reference limit | Knowledge citation limits are token-based. |
History-input check | Compare empty-history and populated-history inputs. |
Structured-output handoff | Validate parsing, then inspect support for field values. |
Three common errors
One common error is retaining permission to use images while trimming away its time scope. Another is summarizing awaiting replacement as replaced, merging different states. Compare the complete clause, supplied passage and status summary to locate the change. If an answer with history adopts long-term retention, check whether that wording concerns the same material and has explicit confirmation. Actual model context capacity cannot be inferred from the reply limit. Space for a longer answer also cannot provide evidence for the cooperation state missing from the supplied material.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should identify the image, applicable period, cleanup progress and cooperation status still requiring confirmation before drawing a use conclusion. Repeat the same question without and with history to see whether long-term wording overrides the current qualification. If output feeds a material-cleanup process through a fixed format, verify that pending replacement still belongs to the old image and that conditions and gaps parse successfully. Any later confirmation needs its own material and period scope, so a result for one picture is not extended to all older assets.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Product Listing, Return and Refund Records, Return Grading Evidence and Settlement Bill |
| Candidate sources | TikTok Shop Seller Center, Order Center, Carrier Tracking and Advertising Report |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |