What the documents look like
For document comparison in TikTok Shop US operations, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A TikTok Shop transaction comparison can examine listing wording beside the question raised in a return record, after establishing each source’s subject. Proposed text separates the published description, the customer’s statement and source identity; an allegation remains an allegation. Describe a reading tool as locating differences and evidence rather than inspecting the product. Without return-grading material, a product name cannot supply a grading result.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Check | Proposed material or condition | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Statement status | Published wording separate from customer claims | Allegation is not an inspection finding |
| Order check | Return material from another order | Remove the mismatch and repeat |
| Version origin | Input populated without a source passage | Obtain the applicable page text |
| Grading gap | No return-grading evidence supplied | No result guessed from product name |
| Handling boundary | Separate approval or relisting authority | Text differences do not directly determine action |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
A return passage from another order cannot establish a difference relevant to this dispute. Inspect order correspondence and cited wording before repeating. Another failure populates a required listing-version input without a source. Trace where that value came from and whether it appeared in the submitted material, then obtain the applicable page text. A populated parameter and an evidenced parameter need separate checks. If output contains a grading conclusion while no inspection source was supplied, trace its cited passage and retain the return-grading gap. Listing text or customer statements cannot provide an actual item-inspection result.
How to verify the setup
Retain distinct identities for listing wording, customer claims and inspection evidence, comparing actual requests, calls and cited differences. Missing suitable required input may prevent invocation; obtain the material and inspect behavior without promising automatic gap detection. Termination prevents a later AI summary of this call. Return approval, relisting or settlement changes require separate authority and business receipts, without deriving a remedy directly from textual differences.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Product Listing, Return and Refund Records, Return Grading Evidence and Settlement Bill |
| Candidate sources | TikTok Shop Seller Center, Order Center, Carrier Tracking and Advertising Report |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |