What the documents look like
For document comparison in Convenience fresh-food orders, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Trace order notes, temperature observations and loss records by goods and shift. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed fresh-food packet contains an order note referring storage to the product label, a current-shift record saying the cabinet display was checked and a loss sheet for damaged rice-ball packaging from the preceding shift. The question concerns whether newly arrived sandwiches have completed storage-condition verification. The label is missing, checking a display supplies no complete observation and the loss concerns another product and shift. Preserve these identities instead of using the existence of temperature or loss paperwork to infer the sandwiches’ condition or invent storage values and requirements.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Transaction-source check | Material and action scope | Acceptance action |
|---|---|---|
| Label reference | Order note lacks label text | Inspect actual original. |
| Viewing action | Complete observation absent | Do not invent a measurement finding. |
| Loss subject | Prior-shift rice balls | Do not transfer to sandwiches. |
| Applicable period | Current shift and batch | Check added-record correspondence. |
| Business state | Text does not decide saleability | Keep evidence unresolved. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, checking the display may become a finding that current goods satisfy conditions; inspect actual observations and applicable product evidence rather than inventing measurements. Second, an earlier rice-ball loss may become a current sandwich defect; compare product, shift and stated cause. Third, the order note may become a claim that the label was read; investigate the actual label and version, retaining unresolved conditions. These need observation data, event attribution and the referenced attachment. None of those evidence types can substitute for the other two in answering the current question.
How to verify the setup
Ask what the order note refers to, what the observation records and which goods the loss concerns, then inspect whether actual references contain label wording. A missing label leaves a source gap rather than a saleability decision; one observation does not describe an entire storage process. Added material must match this batch and period instead of completing the chain with another shift’s records. This exercise compares textual evidence without judging food condition or disposition. Actual ordering, recorded loss and later handling still need their own applicable operation records.