What the documents look like
Retail plastic bag and single-use item reporting sits inside environmental regulation of disposable plastic products, separate from membership marketing or checkout promotions. The working materials are the plastic bag purchase ledger, sales vouchers, the half-year report, and the self-discipline commitment. These come from the commerce ministry reporting system, POS plastic bag sales, the procurement system, and store records. The task on this page is comparison of contract and transaction materials: placing the purchase ledger and the sales vouchers side by side, matching quantity, period, and subject item by item, and deciding whether a draft sentence or handover request is supported by those materials.
The materials update on two levels. Daily data corresponds to POS plastic bag sales and store records; half-year data corresponds to the report and the self-discipline commitment. Tool calls and plugins enter here so the model can decide, from a tool description and its parameter descriptions, whether to invoke a ledger query, a voucher check, or a report read, and then return the run result to the model for summarization. A tool call does not change the authorization state of the material itself, and a retrieval hit does not mean an operation has been approved.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A tool consists of a tool description and tool parameters. Parameters for system modules are fixed; parameters for plugins are configurable. Each parameter carries two key values: the parameter description and whether it is required. When no suitable required parameter exists, the model may decline to call the tool, and prompt wording can guide the user to supply it. In advanced orchestration, available tools are connected to the diamond connector on the tool call module, and the guidance is to add a small number of tools first and tune before expanding. The tool call termination node ends the current call: it does not call further tools and does not call the AI to summarize tool results.
The following is a hypothetical paper exercise used to explain the comparison method. It does not point to any real entity.
Material text one: "The first-half 2025 plastic bag purchase ledger records that Store A purchased 12,000 single-use plastic bags, supplier Company B, arrival date 10 March 2025."
Material text two: "The first-half 2025 POS plastic bag sales voucher summary records that Store A sold 9,500 plastic bags, statistical period 1 January to 30 June 2025."
Draft sentence to be judged: "Store A's first-half 2025 plastic bag purchase and sales quantities match, and the report data can be confirmed."
The draft sentence concerns the same subject, Store A, and the same period, first-half 2025. The ledger field is purchase quantity and the voucher field is sales quantity; the two fields carry different values, so the "match" conclusion is not supported by the materials. The ledger arrival date is 10 March 2025 while the voucher statistical period covers the whole half year, so the two period definitions cannot be subtracted directly. On the authorization boundary, the materials evidence only the quantities recorded in the ledger and the vouchers. They do not record that the report was submitted and do not record regulatory confirmation, so "can be confirmed" in the draft sentence exceeds the material.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Relevant setting or check on this page | Relation to the sample |
|---|---|---|
| Tool description | State the purpose of querying the purchase ledger, sales vouchers, and half-year report, and state the situations in which the tool should not be called | The three material types in the sample map to three tool descriptions |
| Tool parameters | For plugins, check the parameter description and whether it is required; system module parameters are fixed | The query parameters need subject, period, and material type |
| Required parameter completion | When a required parameter is absent the model may not call the tool; complete it through interaction and check the actual request | Store A and first-half 2025 are the required parameters in the sample |
| Tool connection | In advanced orchestration, connect available tools and tune with a small number first | Connect the ledger and voucher tools first; hold the report tool |
| Tool call termination | The termination node ends this call and stops further tool calls and AI summarization | After comparison, termination can be attached to avoid extra summarization |
| Custom tool variables | Add parameter descriptions for nodes not treated as tool parameters | If the report read node is not recognized automatically, add a parameter description |
The values in the table are hypothetical starting points for this page only. The sample uses 12,000 and 9,500 because the material text already records them, and the comparison object is two different field values for the same subject and the same period.
Three common errors
- Treating the purchase quantity in the ledger and the sales quantity in the vouchers as the same field. In the sample the two values are 12,000 and 9,500, and the fields differ, so the pair cannot be judged contradictory and cannot be judged matching.
- Treating a retrieval hit as authorized execution. Finding the ledger and the vouchers only shows the materials exist; the sample does not record that the report was submitted or that a regulator confirmed it, so "can be confirmed" lacks a basis.
- Treating the tool description as a guarantee of execution. The description states purpose, and whether a parameter is required governs whether the model calls the tool. If the period parameter is missing in the sample, the model may not call the voucher tool, and the parameter must be completed interactively before the actual request is checked.
How to verify the setup
- Enter material text one and material text two, and compare the value of the purchase quantity field with the value of the sales quantity field. Record a contradiction only when the field names are the same and the values are mutually exclusive; when the field names differ, record the result as unsupported and keep the evidence gap open.
- Enter the draft sentence to be judged, and compare its subject, period, and conclusion against the material text. When the conclusion exceeds what the materials record, record it as pending verification rather than as a negation or a conflict.
- Enter a query request that is missing a required parameter and observe whether the model calls the tool. If it does not, complete the parameter and observe the actual request content again, recording whether a call occurred without presuming that a call must or must not happen.
If retrieval returns an empty result, an explicit paper input of [] can be used to check the downstream design, without claiming that a fictional rule search necessarily returns []. Libraries spanning different vector models cannot be associated together; check the identifier first and exclude those that do not conform. Knowledge base retrieval does not carry permission or entity isolation, and a retrieval hit does not mean an operation has been authorized.