What the documents look like
For document comparison in Wholesale stall trading, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Stall orders, handwritten records, tenancy and receipt sources have different subjects. Obtain readable passages and supported transaction relationships before interpreting their differences. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A wholesale-stall comparison can collect order, handwritten-sale and receipt passages without amounts or actual voucher values. Proposed sources lack complete delivery and payment confirmation. Limit a tool to supplied readable text; transcription needs actual implementation. Retain parties and goods without treating the tenant as the seller or deriving verified payment from a receipt title.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Transaction-comparison check | Proposed material | Actual evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction roles | Tenant separate from actual seller | Inspect party relationships |
| Readable content | Handwritten original and transcription evidence | Recognition not assumed |
| Voucher identity | Present and other transaction receipt | Establish correspondence before reading |
| Actual invocation | Required text and real request | Heading does not replace missing content |
| Business performance | Separate change, receipt and writing | Comparison is not accounting confirmation |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
A tenant treated as this seller needs transaction passages and party relationships. Unreliably transcribed handwriting producing a definite item needs original and readable-source checks. Another transaction’s receipt applied here needs correspondence. These concern role, content and record identity rather than populated inputs.
How to verify the setup
Retain original provenance, readable text, actual request and cited return. Repeat after corresponding delivery or confirmation arrives and trace this transaction. Missing suitable required input may prevent invocation; collect it through interaction and inspect requests with a small connected tool set. Termination leaves no later AI summary. Changes, payment confirmation and writes need authority and receipts. Comparison establishes neither performance nor reconciled accounts.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Purchase Order, Handwritten Sales Order, Stall Lease Contract and Payment Receipt |
| Candidate sources | Wholesale Market Trends, Stall Inventory, WeChat Pay Collection and Logistics Consignment Note |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |