What the documents look like
For document comparison in Pinduoduo seller campaigns, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Registration, platform messages and refund sources retain activity and order identities. Comparison does not supply operating or payment outcomes absent from those particular records. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A Pinduoduo campaign comparison can collect registration, platform-message and after-sales passages without amounts, prices or outcome figures. Proposed input lacks current campaign acceptance or refund processing. Limit a tool to supplied text with activity, item and order identities. A cost-sheet name supplies no calculation definition, and a sent message is not business approval. Complete titles do not establish connected campaign, stock and service states.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Transaction-comparison check | Proposed material | Actual evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Activity period | Other-period platform message | Inspect identity and time before removal |
| Registration state | Submission separate from acceptance | No direct passing conclusion |
| Financial stage | Request separate from payment record | Not rewritten as returned funds |
| Calculation scope | Cost source provides wording only | No guessed metric or figures |
| Business handling | Separate submission, refund and write | Comparison is not execution |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Another period’s message needs activity and time checks. Submitted registration described as approved needs the current platform reply. A refund request treated as returned funds needs corresponding payment evidence. These concern source, stage and execution rather than conclusions supplied by comparison output.
How to verify the setup
Inspect actual request, invocation and citations. Repeat with this activity’s or order’s evidence and inspect real use. Missing suitable required inputs may prevent calls; collect them through interaction and inspect requests with a small tool set. Termination prevents another AI summary. Submission, refunds and stock writes need permission and receipts. Comparison establishes neither approval, execution nor verified operating performance.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Activity Registration Form, Product Cost Calculation Sheet, After-Sales Refund Order and Platform Internal Message |
| Candidate sources | Pinduoduo Seller Backend, Activity Resource Slot Data, ERP Inventory and Logistics Receipt Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |