What the documents look like
For document comparison in Channel diversion reviews, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Complaints, code records, images and notices need their respective subjects. Reading them does not independently establish diversion, responsibility or an executed penalty. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A channel-source comparison can collect complaint passages, code-record wording and readable inspection-image material without actual codes or commercial amounts. Proposed input lacks complete findings. Limit a tool to supplied text with item, channel and source identity. Complaints are not established facts, images are not presumed automatically read, and similar code descriptions establish neither the same batch nor authorization or a penalty decision.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Transaction-comparison check | Proposed material | Actual evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Batch subject | Other code source introduced | Inspect relationship and remove |
| Image scope | Observation separate from full investigation | No direct determination |
| Notice execution | Penalty wording separate from operation | Obtain this actual receipt |
| Readable origin | Evidence for text produced from image | Automatic recognition not presumed |
| Formal handling | Separate confirmation, penalty and write | Reading is not responsibility determination |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Another batch’s code source needs actual correspondence checks. A photograph treated as a complete investigation needs its observation scope and additional evidence. A penalty notice described as completed handling needs this actual operation record. These concern subject, observed coverage and action rather than complete-looking headings.
How to verify the setup
Inspect requests, invocation and citations. Repeat with corresponding case sources and keep interpretation within passages. Missing suitable required inputs may prevent calls; collect them through interaction and inspect requests using a small tool set. Termination prevents another AI summary. Investigation confirmation, penalties and channel writes need authority and receipts. Comparison establishes neither violations, legal responsibility nor justified handling.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Channel Diversion Complaint Form, Anti-Counterfeiting Code Records, Penalty Notice and Investigation Photos |
| Candidate sources | Anti-Counterfeiting Code System, E-commerce Platform Prices, Dealer Shipment Records and Market Inspection |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |