What the documents look like
For document comparison in Livestream sample inspections, this page examines FastGPT workflow routing. Sample evaluation, inspection reports and supplier qualifications cover different subjects. Comparison must not convert a selection opinion into a sale conclusion for every supplied item. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
A proposed selection note says the sample’s feel awaits review. Inspection material covers only the submitted specimen, while a supplier-qualification excerpt does not describe this item’s applicability. Collect each passage and subject. A person can request sample observation or qualification scope. This exercise supplies no prohibited-sale rules and derives no sale permission from report titles. A bulk-supply contract still needs evidence linking the specimen and batch before extending a sample finding.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Selection transaction check | Proposed source scope | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Inspected subject | Sample only | Not all supplied goods |
| Entity qualification | Item scope absent | Obtain applicability passage |
| Feel observation | Pending review | Not approved selection |
| Human route | Observation or applicability | Correct item received |
| Bulk operations | Procurement and listing separately checked | Sample is not future-batch evidence |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input node | Submitted form values pass to subsequent steps. |
User-selection node | Execution follows the connected selected branch. |
Interaction-state check | Inspect waiting and post-submission states. |
Output handoff check | Compare values passed between steps. |
External-operation responsibility | External business operations require an implementation. |
Three common errors
Sample expanded to every batch needs report-subject and batch-correspondence checks. Misused qualification: Entity material treated as item evidence needs its applicability passage. Pending observation promoted to approval needs this selection’s actual evaluation conclusion. These inspect sample coverage, qualification relationships and decision stage without substituting one for another.
How to verify the setup
Begin with the pending sample observation and inspect the subjects passed to observation and qualification paths. Added item-scope material changes only the qualification interpretation. Keep the tactile assessment pending until its own evidence arrives. Listing, procurement release and formal selection require separately connected business records. Output establishes neither permission to sell nor repeated sample performance across all future batches.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Sample Evaluation Form, Quality Inspection Report, Supplier Qualifications and Prohibited Sales List |
| Candidate sources | Supplier Information, Testing Agency Report, Platform Negative Catalog and Historical Return Rate |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |