What the documents look like
For procurement in Franchise store supervision, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Store requests, regional recommendations and central item confirmation have different decision roles. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed convenience-store procurement packet requests adding a portable pack, recommends considering display changes at regional level and refers approved item scope to a separate list not supplied. A question about purchasing the portable pack directly needs proposer and state preserved. The request expresses demand, the recommendation is a proposal and the item list remains the required source. Similarity between store preference and regional advice cannot establish central confirmation, while display discussion cannot establish an actual supply commitment from a provider.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Procurement source check | Proposed material and scope | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Demand identity | Store preference | Do not upgrade to approval. |
| Recommendation subject | Display adjustment | Do not turn into supplier preparation. |
| List gap | Confirmed scope in separate list | Read actual entries. |
| Store applicability | Other location or period may differ | Check store and period. |
| Citation content | List name differs from list text | Inspect actual transferred scope. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, store preference may become an approved item; inspect the applicable list itself. Second, display-adjustment advice may become stock prepared by a supplier; inspect actual supply confirmation. Third, another store list may be applied here; inspect store identity, period and version. These require decision scope, supply action and source correspondence respectively. A shared brand or region cannot replace conditions for this store. An unprovided list also cannot establish that purchasing the portable pack is prohibited, because absence and a negative decision are separate evidence states.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should ask what the store requests, what regional advice concerns and which item material is confirmed for this store. Trace actual citations. The answer may describe request and advice while retaining item and supply checks, without claiming completed purchasing. If references contain advice alone, inspect scope; an approved-list link still requires text containing the applicable store entries. Later lists need store and period matching. A previous period or another location cannot establish a choice universally applicable to every store merely because the same pack name appears.