What the documents look like
For procurement in Convenience fresh-food orders, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Daily order interest, unresolved delivery coverage and received information need separate interpretation. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed fresh-food procurement packet requests more small portions for the current day, says store delivery coverage requires checking and acknowledges receipt of the requirement. These do not establish formal acceptance of the store order. Interest identifies demand, coverage remains open and the reply records receipt. Citations must retain day and store subjects. Today cannot become availability for every period, and a receipt acknowledgement cannot establish that delivery coverage includes the requesting store. The packet supplies no actual delivery event or product-handling finding.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Procurement source check | Proposed material and scope | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Daily demand | More small portions preferred | Retain day and interest state. |
| Delivery coverage | Store coverage unresolved | Check applicability here. |
| Reply action | Demand received | Check answered request and date. |
| Acceptance evidence | Formal confirmation absent | Do not invent order acceptance. |
| Later scope | One store-day differs from other orders | Check subjects individually. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, an interest sheet may become an accepted order; inspect acceptance for this request. Second, delivery coverage for another store may become coverage here; inspect store identity and applicability. Third, an older acknowledgement may be used to confirm today demand; compare correspondence date with the request answered. These require transaction state, scope correspondence and temporal linkage respectively. A repeated product name cannot establish all three, and unresolved coverage cannot prove that delivery will fail. Keep those evidence questions separate from product condition or quality judgments.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should ask about the daily requirement, store coverage and the subject acknowledged by the reply. Trace actual citation wording, preserving requested increase, pending coverage and received demand without invented delivery results or handling conditions. If references contain only the request, inspect whether coverage and reply passages reached the answer; empty references do not establish that no request was made. Later acceptance needs day, store and item checked. Confirmation for one store-day cannot cover other orders, and this source-reading exercise does not replace quality or storage-condition verification.